Clear The Air News Blog Rotating Header Image

Local

Idling Engine Ban Necessary

SCMP – Updated on Feb 04, 2009

When will Hong Kong stop debating and simply do the right thing and ban all idling vehicles? It is a shame that any vehicle is allowed to sit and idle for more than five minutes. Engines should be switched off to reduce emissions, oil pollution and noise pollution.

I have read that idling vehicles slow down the catalytic converter, which is what helps keep emissions down, but only works when it is hot.

If a vehicle is going to be sitting for more than 30 seconds it is better to shut it off, even though turning it on will use a burst of gas.

While an hour of idling can produce 2.36kg of carbon dioxide in a car, imagine what all these public and tourist buses produce?

We’ve heard it all before, but Hong Kong still has a growing number of people with asthma, lung and heart conditions who would welcome the idea. What is more, this pollution hurts Hong Kong’s tourism and attractiveness as a place of work.

D. F. Weil, Kowloon Bay

Pollution Study Points To Dangers Of ‘Canyon Effect’

Cheung Chi-fai, SCMP – Updated on Feb 02, 2009

The “canyon effect” is to blame for the much higher level of ultrafine air pollutants at bus stops on “walled streets” in Central compared with those in more ventilated areas, a study has shown.

In one comparison, the number of pollutants nearly doubled. The canyon effect refers to the impact – such as poor ventilation and trapped heat – from the creation of canyon-like streets between walls of closely spaced tall buildings.

The study measured the number of ultrafine particles in every cubic centimetre of air, rather than the government’s pollution-monitoring method that tracks the weight of larger particles in every cubic metre of
air.

Ultrafine particles can be as tiny as 20 nanometres in diameter – 2,500 times smaller than the diameter of a human hair.

Although there are no international standards on acceptable levels of the number of ultrafine particles in the air, overseas studies have found they can penetrate directly into blood vessels and lung tissue, causing
harm. Many scientists believe they may be the most harmful form of air pollution.

The Hong Kong study was conducted last year by students at the University of Science and Technology. They found the air at bus stops at sites between walls of buildings on streets with heavy traffic had more ultrafine pollutants than that at bus stops in open spaces, seaward streets and indoors.

The number of particles at the two eastbound bus stops outside Wing Lung Bank and the old Hang Seng building at Des Voeux Road Central were on average 90 per cent and 75 per cent higher than at the bus stop outside Statue Square in Central.

Measurements were taken during evening peak hours on six days between September and December.

Between 48,000 and 137,000 particles were recorded at the Wing Lung Bank bus stop, between 63,000 and 100,000 at the old Hang Seng Bank building bus stop, and a range of 22,000 to 82,000 at the Statue Square bus stop. For comparison, a benchmark reading of 20,000 was recorded at the researchers’ Sai Kung campus on a clear and fine summer day.

Des Voeux Road Central is surrounded by buildings on both sides while the Statue Square stop has more open space in its vicinity, although more buses pass by the square.

“The findings strongly suggest the presence of the canyon effect in Central,” said Lau Ngai-ting, the project’s supervisor. “The number of particles one inhales in the streets would be astronomical.”

He said that while the readings might have varied with changing weather conditions and ambient pollution levels, he believed poor ventilation contributed to higher pollution levels on the streets. Heavy traffic, such
as buses running on large diesel engines, was the key source of ultrafine particles, he said.

Researchers also measured particle levels along three different walking routes between Des Voeux Road Central and Statue Square.

On all three routes, the reading showed high levels of pollutants – hitting a high of 180,000 at one point on the road – but fell below 10,000 in elevated walkways, mall corridors and underground rail stations, where
ventilation was better.

Adrien Chen Kam-cheuk, a chemical and environmental engineering student who initiated the study, said: “Going above ground or underground seems to be a more desirable way for commuters to avoid street-level pollution.”

Mr Lau said regulating traffic through such means as electronic road pricing or low-emission zones might help reduce the pollution level.

Demand To Step Up Monitoring Of Air Quality

Cheung Chi-fai, SCMP – Updated on Feb 02, 2009

Hong Kong should increase the number of air-quality monitoring stations, particularly at the roadside, and incorporate a measurement of very fine particles to give the public a better picture of the health risk it faces, a critic says.

The issue has been raised as the government plans to consult the public on the air-quality objectives review early this year amid pressure for it to adopt the World Health Organisation’s highest standards.

But the Environmental Protection Department said there was no need to enlarge the monitoring network, although it was willing to consider expanding its fine-particles measurements and publish them online.

The city has 14 air-quality monitoring stations – 11 measuring background readings and three roadside readings of five pollutants.

The stations measuring background readings reflect the regional pollution, and the roadside ones – in Causeway Bay, Mong Kok and Central – gauge pollution posing a direct threat to people on the streets.

Only four general and one roadside station measure the level of fine particles – known as PM-2.5 – which overseas research has found to pose a greater health threat.

Last year, the annual reading of fine particles at roadside level in Central reached 41 micrograms per cubic metre of air, four times the WHO standard.

“It is worth studying the issue, given our unique city environment does not favour dispersion of pollutants,” said Alexis Lau Kai-hon, the manager of the Environmental Central Facility at the University of Science and
Technology.

However, Choy So-yuk, a North Point-based district councillor and a member of the Council for Sustainable Development, said it was far more important for the government to improve roadside air quality than to build
more stations.

“Everybody knows the air quality in North Point is far worse than in Central, even without a monitoring station,” she said.

Ms Choy said officials should focus more on getting rid of the wall effect in the city by cutting building heights, and increasing the number of green areas in busy parts of the city.

Economic Crisis Gives Us A Chance To Become Environmentally Friendly

SCMP – Updated on Feb 01, 2009

Air pollution is a major concern in Hong Kong. I think the present financial crisis is the best time to begin changing our energy policies in an effort to lower our air pollution levels. We must do this, because as air quality deteriorates, our health will suffer. With [continuing dependence on oil] and fluctuating oil prices, we will face more economic instability. We have to recognise that as pollution gets worse, some professionals from abroad are reluctant to come and live in Hong Kong. Being a commercial city, there is huge demand for electricity. As a major entrepot in South China, our trucks, ships and aircraft consume a lot of fossil fuel.

I believe our power stations should come up with a strategy to develop renewable energy resources. We are using non-renewable energy, in the form of coal, natural gas and nuclear power. More should be done in Hong Kong to develop wind, solar and biomass energy. We should also consider co-operating with the authorities in Guangdong with a view to a joint venture through which we could develop green energy. Hong Kong could provide the necessary financing for such a joint venture and Guangdong could offer cheap labour and the spare land needed to establish the green projects. By lowering the cost of labour, land and energy, we can persuade foreign investors to set up companies in Hong Kong.

The government should also encourage Hong Kong citizens to save energy. For example, it could offer tax exemptions for environmentally friendly private cars. Tax penalties could be imposed on cars that pollute because of the fuel they use. I think the tax on plastic bags is a good start. We need to develop a new culture of responsibility regarding the environment. Instead of creating construction jobs as a way to stimulate the economy, we should consider ways of creating green job opportunities, especially for the unskilled who are out of work. For example, people will be needed to categorise our refuse and promote a recycling programme for Hong Kong’s households.

As I said, I think the economic downturn offers us a golden opportunity to diversify and develop green industries.

Stefan Lam Kit-yung, Tuen Mun

Hong Kong To Revise Air Pollution Index

ChinaCSR – January 16, 2009

Edward Yau, the secretary of the Environmental Protection Department of Hong Kong, has stated that Hong Kong will work out a range of measures this year and hold public consultations with the aim of updating the air pollution index.

Yau also stressed that he hoped that the revised rule on parking would be enacted soon.

Yau says he was inspired by the National Development and Reform Commission’s guideline planning for the Pearl River Delta Development in which cooperation between Hong Kong and the Pearl River Delta region on the environment was mentioned and a regional green living area was scheduled. Yau said that Hong Kong’s air pollution index which was initiated in the 80’s is already outdated and the consultants’ report is almost complete. A series of measures is expected to be launched within 12 months and the government will consult with the public on the steps to adopt the new measures.

Currently, Hong Kong refers to the World Health Organization for its air pollution index. If it wants to reach the highest standard, it needs to reduce sulfur dioxide emission from its power stations by 95% and change the use of coal fuel power.

KMB To Phase Out Older Buses

Anita Lam, SCMP – Updated on Jan 16, 2009

Kowloon Motor Bus intends to phase out within three years its 400-plus buses built before 1992 in favour of less polluting models.

The other main franchised bus operators, New World First Bus and Citybus, have pledged to phase out their 90 pre-1992 models – known as pre-Euro because they began operating before the European Union began setting emissions standards in 1992 – by 2012. They will also phase out more than 400 Euro I buses – which meet the EU’s 1992 standards – by then.

KMB principal engineer Kane Shum Yuet-hung said although it operated 401 pre-Euro buses, they had long ago been upgraded to meet the Euro I standards. Likewise its 943 Euro I buses had been upgraded to meet the 1996 Euro II standards.

By next year, when fitting of particulate filters to its 1,675 Euro II and III buses was finished, the emissions of its fleet would be 90 per cent less than they were in 1992.

“After [this upgrade], I guarantee you will never again see black smoke coming from a bus exhaust pipe,” Mr Shum said.

He said the Transport Department had approved its purchase of 145 Euro IV buses that met 2005 EU standards, delivery of which was expected this year. KMB would seek approval later to buy another 256 of the buses to complete the phase-out.

Pre-Euro and Euro I buses accounted for half the 100 tonnes of respirable suspended particles (RSPs) and nitrogen oxides franchised buses emitted in 2006. Euro IV buses emit 97 per cent less RSPs than pre-Euro buses, 61 per cent less nitrogen oxides and 81 per cent less hydrocarbons.

Meanwhile, opposition to another measure to improve air quality rose, with some taxi drivers threatening industrial action unless granted a hot-weather exemption from a proposed ban on idling engines.

But Secretary for the Environment Edward Yau Tang-wah told lawmakers that such an exemption would be unfair to pedestrians, who would feel uncomfortable inhaling engine exhaust on hot days.

Govt Optimistic Over Pollution Targets

RTHK – 13-01-2009

The government says Hong Kong is on track to meet targets set for reducing emissions by next year. It said three out of four pollutants – including nitrogen oxide – had already been cut to near these levels. Sulphur dioxide emissions remain high, but the Deputy Director of Environmental Protection, Carlson Chan, told legislators that new systems being installed by the power companies could more than halve such pollution. However, the chairwoman of Legco’s sub-committee on air quality, Audrey Eu, said progress would depend to a great extent on what action is taken on the mainland.

Anger Grows Over Inaction On Air Pollution

Paggie Leung, SCMP – Updated on Jan 11, 2009

Public dissatisfaction with government and private sector efforts to ease air pollution has soared, a poll has shown, with nearly eight out of 10 residents unhappy with the situation.

The “Hong Kong’s Silent Epidemic” study was conducted by Baptist University’s Hong Kong transition project director Michael DeGolyer on behalf of Civic Exchange.

The poll surveyed 1,020 residents between September and October.

It found that most respondents – 77 per cent – were dissatisfied with efforts by top government officials to improve air quality, 22 percentage points higher than in a similar survey in 2001. Only 16 per cent said they were content with the status quo.

About two-thirds were disappointed with government attempts to fight air pollution, up 19 percentage points from 48 per cent in 2001. “The report demonstrates that the public is increasingly aware and concerned about air pollution, but feels its concerns are not being heard or addressed,” the study said.

Nearly seven in 10 interviewees were dissatisfied with the business sector’s efforts to deal with pollution, compared to about five in 10 in 2001.

Seventy-four per cent of those surveyed said they had complained to someone about air pollution.

Most cited the effects on their own or their family’s health.

Most people who did not complain believed “air pollution affects them but they don’t believe complaining would do any good and about half don’t know who to complain to”, the report said.

Part of the study was released on Monday. It found that one in five residents were considering leaving the city to escape pollution, while one in 10 were seriously considering such a move or had plans to go.

A government spokesman said it had been implementing strong measures to control emissions at source, especially from roads and power stations. There were also joint plans with Guangdong to reduce smog.

The government said it was reviewing air quality objectives, including guidelines published by the World Health Organisation.

“The review will propose new objectives and a long-term air quality management strategy,” he added.

Board Backs Smaller Developments

Olga Wong, SCMP – 10 January 2009

A meeting of the Town Planning Board yesterday endorsed the Planning Department’s action to reduce the bulkiness of residential developments proposed on the former North Point Estate site. But the meeting, which discussed the planning brief prepared by the department, urged the Transport Department to reduce the size of the public transport terminal to reduce air and noise pollution at street level.

Tour Buses Should Not Be Given Dispensation From Idling Ban

SCMP – Updated on Jan 09, 2009

So tour bus operators are seeking a three-year exemption from an idling-engine ban. The Environment Bureau and our legislators must flatly refuse to entertain this proposal.

Every day hundreds of thousands of Hong Kong people wait patiently at bus terminals and stops for public buses. At terminals the engine is turned on only when the bus is ready to depart. At bus stops the vehicles pause just long enough to load and unload. There is no reason why visitors to Hong Kong should not follow the same routine. Arrival information can include a notice advising that this is how we do things here.

Some people say banning idling engines will have no effect on air quality. I doubt that any of these individuals are out and about on our streets every day and are exposed to the foul air and noise pollution that idling engines generate.

Ordinary Hong Kong people cannot even go to beaches like Repulse Bay, take a day out at Stanley or walk along the waterfront at Tsim Sha Tsui without being blasted by exhaust fumes from idling tour buses. A walk to Bauhinia Square in Wan Chai, that should be a well ventilated stroll, leaves one gasping for breath from the 50-odd tour buses with their engines running and drivers with their feet up.

Exemptions on green and red minibuses must be kept to a minimum. A minibus can leave its doors and windows open. There is no reason why passengers in a minibus queue cannot wait to board just as passengers on public buses do. With all those engines turned off the temperature and air quality will make waiting on our streets a lot more pleasant.

Our government’s duty before all else is to protect the interests of the Hong Kong public. Many of our visitors come from countries that have already introduced clean air measures and will accept and welcome restrictions. The others will see that an idling-engine ban does make a difference and this will encourage them to spread the message in their home countries.

We have waited far too long for this legislation to be passed. It must not be diluted to appease the interests of the minority transport lobby that consistently opposes change.

Candy Tam, Wan Chai