dynamco Aug 31st 2013
9:19am
people should think on why the HKZHM bridge came about
Zhuhai airport was not allocated any international destinations
HK Airport Authority owns 55% of the company which operates Zhuhai airport
So the bridge will bring export airfreight from Zhuhai to Chep Lap Kok
a second reason for building the bridge is ……………………………. ?
rpasea Aug 31st 2013
6:53am
“Think big”….there was an article in the press about Singapore’s “think big” plans and one element would be applicable to HK: Singapore will move its container port to a more remote area and build a new city in the current location. Why not move Kwai Chung container port to China, where it belongs, and build a new city there? We could have another Taikoo Shing (Kwai Chung Shing?) located close to the major employments areas and with infrastructure in place. Why build a new Shatin in the remote NT when we can build a new town in a better location?
Published on South China Morning Post (http://www.scmp.com)
Home > Integrating airports, not another runway, is long-term solution
Integrating airports, not another runway, is long-term solution
Saturday, 31 August, 2013, 12:00am
Comment› Letters
I agree with your editorial (“Stop bickering and think big [1]“, August 20) as Hong Kong has moved down through the gears since the 1997 handover, and it seems that we are now driving with the handbrake on, despite our powerful fiscal position.
The Kai Tak site offered an opportunity to think big, but our cruise terminal is underwhelming. The grand vision of the Central waterfront is already a disappointment.
West Kowloon’s woodland park shows no signs of life. Our competitors such as Shanghai and Singapore would have implemented significantly more at these unique and dramatic locations. Hong Kong has lost its confident wide vision, and now bureaucratically seeks blinkered reactive solutions. The transport situation in the Pearl River Delta also illustrates this view.
The Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macau bridge is catering only to narrow vested interests. The present push for a third runway at Chek Lap Kok is an easy orthodox response but avoids having to think outside the box. There is ample aircraft runway capacity in the delta region but a severe shortage of airspace.
It is the most congested airspace in China: besides Chek Lap Kok, Guangzhou Baiyun, Shenzhen Baoan, Zhuhai Jinwan, and Macau airports are competing for this space. It is a case of “one country, five airports”, and despite official pledges of co-operation and the signing of a memorandum of understanding in 2011 there appears little movement to control airspace centrally.
In the delta region, each airport is “paddling its own canoe”. If London acted in this unco-ordinated manner with City, Gatwick, Heathrow, Luton, Southend and Stansted airports there would be air traffic chaos. It is common sense to closely integrate Chek Lap Kok, Macau, Zhuhai, and Shenzhen under a single management. Just adding runway capacity at Hong Kong is not a solution. Public transport needs must trump private commercial interests.
It should have been a “no-brainer” to extend our Airport Express line to these three airports, but ludicrously the Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macau bridge only serves road traffic – contrary to government policy of giving precedence to rail.
We need a rapid and secure transport system to whisk travellers between these four airports. Instead of spending billions of dollars on the ecologically damaging reclamation for a third runway, authorities should invest into the vanguard of Elon Musk’s “Hyperloop” high-speed-transit system. The pneumatic tube ferrying the passengers could be mounted on the Hong Kong-Zhuhai bridge. It would also create some excitement about Hong Kong as we become increasingly dull.
Charlie Chan, Mid-Levels
Source URL (retrieved on Aug 31st 2013, 9:20am): http://www.scmp.com/comment/letters/article/1300832/integrating-airports-not-another-runway-long-term-solution