Bold vision of reclamation

Comment›Letters

I refer to the report (“Unease over reclamation”, April 29), and would like to provide information on the vision and overall planning in the proposals for reclamation outside Victoria Harbour.

When identifying the five possible locations for reclamation, priority is given to near-shore reclamation that can be efficiently connected to existing roads and developed areas, and to man-made shorelines distant from existing communities, while avoiding ecologically sensitive areas.

Lung Kwu Tan is one such site that can be well integrated into existing transport infrastructure, providing an area of economic growth and job opportunities. Ma Liu Shui is a location that can provide land for much-needed housing and community facilities, hence addressing the pressing housing demand. Close to Sha Tin town centre, it can be easily linked with the existing railway. The site’s potential could be further enhanced by integrating with the land released by relocating the sewage treatment plant nearby into a rock cavern.(CTA: why not move Legco and Govt HQ from its prime site to a cavern and build the proposed incinerator on the current Admiralty site since it is so modern and clean and adjoining the sea?)

The two sites on Lantau have the merit of connecting with major economic and tourist infrastructure (for example, the airport, Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macau bridge), (CTA: so we want more Mainland and other tourists ??) being in line with the HK2030 Study and the Revised Lantau Concept Plan to facilitate strategic economic development and supporting development of Tung Chung. On the other hand, Tsing Yi southwest, with its easy access to existing transportation nodes, has the potential of becoming a regional logistics node.(CTA: this guy needs testing for hallucinogens? – Shenzhen port will soon be world number 2 and Shanghai (world no 1 shipping port) are less expensive than Hong Kong and are closer to the manufacturing sources as are Mainland airports with their new runways and flight clearances.)

The above demonstrates that there are strategic thoughts and planning underpinning the reclamation proposals. It must be emphasised that we did not start from ground zero, as much planning has been done in the past: the Lantau concept plan, various infrastructural planning, and the studies for the tourism and logistics industries. All these guide and back our recommendations.(CTA: sorry no more room in teh street or in the hotels and the same-day tourists do not benefit the people, they benefit the tycoons)

The proposed artificial islands in the central waters between Lantau and Hong Kong Island represent a different proposition. They are envisaged as a long-term option for new development areas.(CTA – indeed they are intended to become the new ash lagoons for the daily 1,000 tonnes of ash from the SWC planned incinerator !) With fewer environmental constraints and high planning flexibility, they can become the urban extension (of our landfills) if a convenient and cost-effective transport system can be provided. We hope to receive public support for the next step on artificial islands: conducting studies on engineering feasibility, possible land uses and transport links, and carrying out assessment on the potential impact on the environment, marine ecology and traffic.

It is a bold vision that we hope to discuss with the public and gain their support.

Edwin K.H. Tong, head of civil engineering office, Civil Engineering and Development Department

Reclamation

Development

Planning