Clear The Air News Blog Rotating Header Image

April, 2008:

Campaigners Get On Their Bikes For Cycle-Path Protest

Annemarie Evans – SCMP – Updated on Apr 07, 2008

A hundred cyclists campaigned yesterday for a cycle path along Victoria Harbour by cycling along the waterfront – or rather, the limited parts of it they could get to.

Led by Ho Loy, the heritage activist and failed Legislative Council by-election candidate, marshals from the Hong Kong Cycling Alliance and Hong Kong Cycling Information net and a contingent from the Civic Party, they made their way from Cadogan Street in Kennedy Town over to Sheung Wan.

Some also planned to cycle back to Planning Department offices in North Point, to post a letter outlining the need for a harbour cycling path.

Civic Party leader Audrey Eu Yuet-mee, who saw the cyclists off at the start, said that unlike the New Territories there were no facilities for cyclists on Hong Kong Island.

“Why should a cycle path be seen as a luxury item? Why does everything have to be about the dollar sign?” she said.

Ms Ho said the Eastern District Council had asked the Planning Department for a boardwalk under the Island Eastern Corridor, which could easily double alongside a cycle path.

Organisers were unhappy with the way police split the group into batches of 10 cyclists on the road. “They forced us to start up separately,” said alliance member Martin Turner. “If we’re all in one group, it’s much safer. It would also have been less trouble for the police.”

A police community relations officer said the riders needed to split up in order not to block traffic.

Frenchman Richard Ferge, 36, and his English wife, Stani, are staying in Hong Kong for two weeks having taken several years off work to cycle around the world.

“It’s quite challenging to cycle here,” Mr Ferge said. “It’s not an environment with cyclists in mind. Particularly in Europe, people in cities are returning to the bicycle. But here and in Shanghai they have moved from the bicycle to the car.”

Legislator Fernando Cheung Chiu-hung, who cycled with several other members of the Civic Party, said: “I think a bike path along Hong Kong Island is something people long for, so we’re in support of that.”

Cyclists Take To Streets In Campaign For Path

Timothy Chui – Monday, April 07, 2008 – The Standard

Forty cyclists became pathfinders yesterday when they carved a route from Kennedy Town to Shau Kei Wan through congested streets to dramatize their fight for a harborfront cycle path.

The group included conservationist Ho Loy and Civic Party lawmakers Fernando Cheung Chiu-hung, Mandy Tam Heung-man and Audrey Eu Yuet- mee.

They stopped off at the North Point headquarters of the Planning Department to deliver a letter from the Hong Kong Cycling Alliance and Hong Kong Cycling Information.net.

The HKCA and HKCI want a bicycle path included in the department’s seafront promenade blueprint.

Eu said the government’s policy of squeezing every dollar per square foot has left out considerations such as allowing more open space for the public on the south side of Victoria Harbour.

“We’ve been indoctrinated into an air-conditioned city environment to the extent that a cycle path is a luxury.”

Cycling enthusiast Dick Chan Tak- hung, 50, said: “The town isn’t bike friendly and forcing riders off sidewalks into sharing the road with car drivers is dangerous.”

Without providing adequate cycling networks, the government has put cyclists in harm’s way, Chan added.

There were two fatalities last year. A seven-year-old boy was killed in April and a 13-year-old boy the following month after being struck by vehicles while cycling.

Change Of Climate In The Business World

Sheila Bonini, Greg Hintz and Lenny Mendonca – Updated on Apr 07, 2008 – SCMP

Business executives are catching up with consumers in expressing concern about global warming and other environmental issues, two global surveys of senior executives and consumers by McKinsey indicate.

In a sea of change over the past 12 months, executives now regard the environment as the sociopolitical issue that will attract the most attention, by far, from the public and politicians over the next five years.

Consumers also want healthier and safer products, retirement and health-care benefits for employees, and much else besides, though their expectations vary by industry and geography.

What is more, they say clearly that the performance of an industry or a company on a wide range of societal issues affects not only its reputation but also their willingness to buy its products.

Each corporation faces a wide range of risks specific to the industries, regions, and countries in which it operates. But our surveys also reveal that companies have significant opportunities to differentiate themselves and to increase shareholder value by acting responsibly and by providing products and services that address the consumers’ concerns.

Executives and consumers are now equally concerned about environmental issues, including climate change. Fifty-one per cent of the executives – up 20 percentage points from 2006 – pick it as one of three sociopolitical issues that will attract the most attention during the next five years. Among consumers, 55 per cent agree. Almost 90 per cent of executives and consumers say they are personally very or somewhat worried about global warming, and clear majorities see a role for government as well as business and consumers in tackling climate change.

Taking action on global warming and other environmental issues seems critical for narrowing a trust gap between consumers and corporations. But many corporations would be wrong to focus almost all of their efforts on environmental issues and to forget about others that are important in their industries. The industries we covered in the survey – petroleum, food and beverages, retailing, and high-tech – have a common need to tackle environmental issues but otherwise face different societal challenges and opportunities.

In retailing, for example, consumer research suggests that measures such as reducing energy consumption and selling environment-friendly products are important for winning credibility as a socially responsible company.

In food and beverages, most respondents in most of the countries surveyed said they were willing to pay more for food and drink from companies that address the respondents’ most important concerns about health (food safety, fat content, the use of pesticides and genetically modified products) and the environment (waste and pollution, the impact of packaging and global warming).

Hi-tech companies could take a wide range of environmental and social actions to improve their reputations and differentiate themselves from competitors. But such strategies may be complex, as the measures that consumers emphasise vary widely by country.

Business leaders need a nuanced understanding of how the performance of companies in addressing social and environmental issues affects reputations and sales. By tracking consumer attitudes at a fine-grained level, they would improve their chances of gaining a competitive advantage and, at the same time, of addressing global problems.

Sheila Bonini is a consultant in McKinsey’s Silicon Valley office, Greg Hintz is a consultant in the New Jersey office and Lenny Mendonca is a director in the San Francisco office. This article was originally published in the McKinsey Quarterly

Mainland Cement Makers Seek Higher Prices, Technology Upgrades

Kandy Wong in Shanghai – Updated on Apr 07, 2008 – SCMP

For cement makers, it’s all about price and pollution. The mainland is experiencing surging steel and coal prices. But cement industry executives who met in Shanghai last week said the price of the basic raw material for buildings and toll-roads was only half that of international prices.

“A higher price will give investors a fair return,” said Tom Clough, a member of the executive committee of Switzerland’s Holcim, one of the world’s largest cement producers with a 40 per cent stake in A-share listed Huaxin Cement.

The average price for thermal coal rose 20 per cent last year and analysts said steel prices would increase 25 per cent this year on soaring demand for iron ore. But the average price for cement only rose 7 per cent last year to 600 yuan (HK$667) per tonne.

Industry executives said they needed higher prices, and not just for shareholders.

“Many Chinese cement companies need funds to upgrade their technology and enhance environmental protection,” said Mr Clough.

The cleaner way of making cement is the modern dry process. Limestone and other materials, such as sand, iron ore and clay, are put in a rotary kiln at temperatures as high as 1,450 degrees Celsius to produce black and nodular clinker, the precursor of cement.

The central government is encouraging mainland cement companies to adopt the dry process because it can be upgraded to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, which contribute to global warming.

But only about 55 percent of the industry uses this technology. The rest use a much older, cheaper technology, heating up limestone and coal in a simple big burner to producing cement, releasing sulphur and carbon dioxide into the air.

“Cement companies should always be aware of energy efficiency and emission reductions,” said National Development and Reform Commission official Jia Yinsong.

“The 59 low-temperature, heat-saving electricity generating machines used for the cement companies last year saved 1.4 million tonnes of coal and reduced carbon dioxide emissions by 3.64 million tonnes.”

One way Beijing is attacking the pollution problem is consolidation.

The State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission suggested early last year that the cement industry should be led by 12 pillar companies. It is a policy that would require industry consolidation to eliminate small, polluting companies.

But Huaxin Cement chief executive Li Yeqing has a different goal.

“The top 12 are already here in terms of capacity, but not in terms of performance and profitability,” he said. “What we need is modern ideas from global players by transforming technology into quality and performance because big cement companies should aim to be national brands.”

Mr Clough agreed. “China should have a slight change in mentality about big being impressive,” he said. “They should be concerned about profitability.”

Other World Cities Have Proved That Road Pricing Works

SCMP – Updated on Apr 06, 2008

Your editorial (“High levy a poor excuse for delaying electronic toll”, March 30) is spot on.

Hong Kong was one of the first cities to consider such a charge, yet despite decades of studies that have indicated positive benefits for electronic road pricing (ERP), a baffling bureaucratic inertia remains.

Even the former secretary for environment, transport and works, Sarah Liao Sau-tung, complained that she had been advised by a senior official that this ERP subject was “untouchable” (“Civil servants can be too inflexible, says Sarah Liao” July 3, 2007).

Is it “untouchable” because the powerful construction lobby and transport engineers want large, costly infrastructure schemes? Unlike these people, the public understands that ERP can have a positive role in the “down-town” areas.

The empirical evidence that ERP can help control both congestion and carbon dioxide emissions is available from other “world cities” where a congestion fee has already been introduced.

This year Milan also imposed an “eco-pass” charge (which is equivalent to HK$115) for entering the inner city.

This charge is expected to lead to a 30 per cent reduction in pollution levels and a 10 per cent reduction in traffic.

The money raised will go towards cycle paths and on improving public transport.

Hong Kong is now trailing in traffic control, pollution control and urban planning.

It appears self-evident that our government is only interested in policies that pour more concrete, regardless of the impact on the environment and the community – for example the Hong Kong-Macau-Zhuhai road bridge, where surely a rail bridge would be a better solution.

Red herrings are common in our harbour, and the government’s confused statements (“Bypass could halve levy for drive to Central”, March 30) indicate that this species is thriving much better than the pink dolphins.

Roger Emmerton, Wan Chai

Insurers Push Coverage Against Environmental Damage

Cameron Dueck – Updated on Apr 05, 2008 – SCMP

Insurance companies have begun selling environmental insurance policies on the mainland, marking what could be the start of a trend towards more responsible corporate behaviour and broader government requirements for industrial companies to buy pollution liability coverage.

Environmental insurance forces companies to clean up their act because a company must improve its environmental security before it buys coverage, and thereby a system of requiring such insurance raises pollution standards.

Insurers will not cover a company which is not already showing an attempt to reduce the risk of environmental damage.

“The petrochemical, oil and gas companies clearly have exposure, as well as the manufacturing sector. We’ve also placed policies in the real estate sector in partnership with banks, the high-end commercial or residential projects,” said Jim Finnamore, regional environmental practice leader at insurance broker Marsh. Insurers and brokers declined to provide the names of policy buyers.

Foreign companies such as ACE Group, AIG and Chubb Group are leading the push along with state-owned People’s Insurance Co of China (PICC).

“We have sold a few policies, but I’d say that by the end of the year we expect our business in this area to be much more significant,” said Karl Russek, who heads ACE Group’s international environmental risk business.

ACE is the largest shareholder in Hutai Insurance, which last month became the first local firm to gain approval from the China Insurance Regulatory Commission to offer environmental coverage on the mainland. The company is offering coverage for both first-party clean-up and third-party claims with limits up to US$25 million.

“The early customers have been multinationals that have large consumer brands which are globally sensitive or have financing tied to environmental requirements,” Mr Russek said.

The State Environmental Protection Administration (Sepa) in February introduced a “green insurance system” requiring industrial companies to buy insurance against potential environmental damage. That CIRC-backed plan will try to provide closer monitoring of companies and help victims obtain compensation, particularly if the polluting firm was unable to make amends or if it declared bankruptcy.

Sepa said it would introduce the programme on a test basis in several regions with the goal of having a nationwide system in place by 2015. Insurers predict the pilot will be launched within months in one of the heavily industrialised southeastern provinces.

“The regulators are actively soliciting from the insurance industry for suggestions on how the programme should be structured,” Mr Russek said.

The extra cost of buying yet another form of liability insurance may keep local companies from signing up until they are forced to do so.

“We’ve developed a product for hi-tech companies, which has been approved by CIRC and we’re now discussing that product with some clients,” said Shao Yunzhou, director of liability insurance product development at PICC. “But at the moment a lot of companies can’t afford the high premiums, so we’re now researching other options, like low-limit coverage.”

China’s system of mandatory environmental insurance is expected to be similar to that of countries such the United States and Germany. While mainland industrials may not operate as cleanly as their counterparts in Europe, the key thing that insurers need in order to start underwriting is clear and consistently enforced rules.

“Provided there is a standard, we can underwrite to that standard,” Mr Russek said. “While it’s clear there’s not the same history of regulation in China as there is in some places, one should not doubt the seriousness with which Sepa is approaching this.”

The agency has introduced a green securities policy to force firms to undergo environmental inspections before raising capital and a green credit policy to limit bank lending to energy-intensive and polluting industries.

While the agency has been spinning its wheels in trying to launch these policies its success rate could change after Beijing last month elevated the status of Sepa to ministry level, creating the Ministry of Environmental Protection.

Coal-to-fuel Projects Risk Green Backlash

Eric Ng in Beijing – Updated on Apr 05, 2008 SCMP

Turning coal into liquid fuel and chemicals is a potentially lucrative business on the energy-hungry mainland, but Beijing’s concerns about the environmental impact of such projects means investors risk getting their fingers burned.

Tse Bing, chairman of Hong Kong-listed mainland drugmaker Sino Biopharmaceutical, agreed in 2006 to take a 43 per cent stake in a 5 billion yuan (HK$5.55 billion) joint venture with two Shaanxi government companies to build a coal-to-chemical plant in Yulin city. However, the project in the coal-rich province hit a snag after it was launched in 2003, and it is now in limbo. Producing usable fuel from coal requires large amounts of water and energy, raising the ire of environmentalists.

“The Shaanxi government has failed to deliver a province-wide environmental impact assessment demanded by the State Environmental Protection Administration (Sepa) on coal-to-chemical projects, so the project has been stalled,” he said.

Mr Tse, vice-president of the Thai-Chinese run conglomerate Chia Tai Group and the parent of Sino Biopharmaceutical, said Sepa wanted to know whether the project would emit more carbon dioxide and consume more water than the parched province could support.

With worsening air and water pollution rising to the top of Beijing’s political agenda, projects such as coal-to-liquid fuel are being closely scrutinised by increasingly powerful regulators. Sepa was elevated to full ministry status at the National People’s Congress last month.

“When we first discussed co-operation with the provincial government, Beijing had not stipulated water resource and environment protection regulations over such projects,” he said. “The provincial government told us both issues should not be a problem, but now it has not passed the central government’s scrutiny.”

The National Development and Reform Commission stopped approving new coal-to-liquid fuel and chemical projects in mid-2006, citing environmental concerns and pending a comprehensive industry development plan. That plan has still not been released.

The commission has also banned coal-to-liquid fuel projects of less than 3 million tonnes of annual capacity, coal-to-methanol projects of less than 1 million tonnes and coal-to-olefin projects of less than 600,000 tonnes in capacity.

Methanol is a fuel and industrial solvent, while olefins are key chemical building blocks for plastics and man-made fibres.

Producing such products from coal, instead of crude oil, is part of Beijing’s strategy to cut reliance on crude imports.

Fuel and chemicals produced from coal are largely free of sulphuric gases which cause acid rain. But they produce large amounts of greenhouse effect-causing carbon dioxide, unless plants are fitted with expensive carbon capture and storage (CCS) facilities that are still in an early development stage.

With oil prices surging to record highs, these projects appear hugely profitable if environmental costs are excluded. Industry executives saying they are profitable as long as crude oil stays above US$30 a barrel.

Peter de Wit, executive vice-president of energy giant Royal Dutch/Shell’s clean coal energy division, said it was too early too tell when the mainland would install CCS facilities, although they were expected to be introduced gradually in Europe in the next five to 10 years in coal-burning energy and chemical projects.

“By 2050, for our atmosphere to cope with carbon dioxide emissions, we expect 90 per cent of Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development nations and at least 50 per cent of non-OECD countries will have to install CCS,” he said.

Chia Tai had invested some 400 million yuan towards the development of a coal-to-chemical technology at the Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics under the Chinese Academy of Sciences, and held rights to its licensing, Mr Tse said.

Previously, project developers could start construction after getting support from local governments, which are more eager to see projects go ahead to drive employment and industrial output.

Mr Tse’s project, originally scheduled to come on stream late last year, had received approval from the local government but failed to meet the NDRC’s scale requirements, he said. Chia Tai had therefore decided not to proceed with building.

“We didn’t dare move ahead because we were worried these projects may have a similar fate to the infamous Tieben steel project,” he said. “We don’t want our project to become a white elephant.”

Tieben Iron and Steel was ordered by Beijing in 2004 to cease building of its planned 10.6 billion yuan steel plant in Changzhou, Jiangsu province, after government officials were found to have assisted in the misappropriation of land for the project, which was approved by the local government but was out of line with Beijing’s industry policy.

Despite the regulatory problems facing private operators, several state-backed firms including China Shenhua Group, Datang Power International Generation and Yanzhou Coal Mining, have moved ahead with construction of their coal-to-chemical projects and are expected to come on stream this year or next.

Shenhua and Yanzhou claim they have obtained all necessary approvals, although Datang admitted its project is still subject to final approval from the NDRC.

In addition to failing to clear environmental hurdles, Mr Tse said Chia Tai also ran into problems with the local government on its investment in a coal mine in Yushuwan, Yulin, which would have supplied the coal-to-chemical project.

Chia Tai has a 40 per cent stake in the mining project, while listed Yanzhou Coal Mining has 41 per cent and a local government firm 19 per cent.

He said the local government had demanded that it pay more than 2 billion yuan in additional investment after it had already invested some 266 million yuan into the project.

The joint venture agreement has still not been sanctioned by the local government.

Mr Tse said Chia Tai still wanted to settle the dispute through negotiations, adding it has been looking at investing in other coal-to-chemical projects in Xinjiang to hedge its bets.

Pearl River Delta Air Just Keeps Getting Worse

Guangdong cities on list of filthy

Shi Jiangtao in Beijing and Cheung Chi-fai – Updated on Apr 04, 2008 – SCMP

Air quality in the Pearl River Delta is some of the filthiest on the mainland, with the number of smoggy days recorded in Shenzhen and Dongguan shooting up last year.

Shenzhen recorded 231 smoggy days, a sharp increase from 164 in 2006, the lead story in the Southern Weekend newspaper said yesterday.

Dongguan, one of the top industrial cities in Guangdong and home to many Hong Kong factories, was now the dirtiest city in the province in terms of air pollution, the newspaper said.

Quoting a report by meteorological experts in Beijing and Guangzhou, the newspaper included delta cities, especially those west of the Pearl River mouth, on a list of mainland cities suffering from the worst smog recorded across the country. The cities span the most developed regions, including Beijing, Shanghai, Xian , Chengdu , Taiyuan and Shenyang , Nanjing and Hangzhou.

The report came after Premier Wen Jiabao declared an initial victory in curbing pollution last year.

It has sparked doubts about the effectiveness of pollution controls which cost billions of yuan annually.

About 358,000 urban dwellers in 600 mainland cities died prematurely from breathing polluted air in 2004, said the report from the Chinese Academy of Environmental Planning under the newly upgraded Ministry of Environmental Protection.

Health costs from premature deaths and serious illness associated with air pollution were estimated at 152.7 billion yuan in 2004.

Academy chief engineer Wang Jinnan said Hong Kong had been hit hard by the worsening pollution.

The Guangdong Meteorological Bureau said earlier that 27 major cities and counties in the province, including Guangzhou, had experienced the worst smog last year in the 59 years records had been kept. The provincial capital recorded 75.5 smoggy days last year, with 22 days in December alone.

Bureau atmospheric scientist Wu Dui told the newspaper that mainland pollution standards, which measured only three main air pollutants – sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and particulate matter with a median diameter less than 10 microns – were partly to blame for appalling pollution and mounting health risks.

Most industrial countries and the World Health Organisation believe PM2.5, which refers to particulate matter with a median diameter less than 2.5 microns, is a more accurate standard for evaluating airborne pollution. Particulate matter from the burning of fossil and other types of fuels, is the main pollutant in most mainland cities.

The academy’s Professor Wang said progress reported by the government may not accurately reflect real air pollution.

He said it would take years before the country could start measuring the much smaller particulate matter, believed to be the real cause of deaths, as only big cities like Beijing and Guangzhou had the technology.

Hong Kong has just experienced the smoggiest March since 2004.

The Hong Kong Observatory recorded 137 hours of reduced visibility during the month. Despite various anti-pollution measures introduced last year, the city’s air pollution reading in 2007 was also the worst since 2004, with 87 days when the air pollution index (API) registered over 100.

Last year, there were 74 days with high API readings recorded, compared to 49 days in 2005 and 56 days in 2006.

China’s Belching Factories Take A Toll On Japan’s Famous Ice Trees

Agence France-Presse in Yamagata – Updated on Apr 04, 2008

Skier Kazumi Furukawa can vividly recall the time three years ago when she stood on Mount Zao and looked down at fir trees turned into glittering crystals.

“The sky was cobalt blue and I could see the tiny snow crystals on the tips of the tree branches,” Ms Furukawa, 56, remembers with a smile.

But these days, the natural phenomenon is growing rarer, and scientists say the culprit is beyond Japan’s control – industrial pollution from China.

Mount Zao is whipped every year by wet winds from across the Sea of Japan, or East Sea, that form hoar frost – layers of ice and snow that shine like crystals on trees. The Japanese call them juhyo, or ice trees.

Skiers from Japan and other Asian nations regularly fly to the 1,600- metre mountain just for a glimpse of the juhyo, which local people describe as little monsters for their intricate twisted shapes.

Fumitaka Yanagisawa, an assistant professor of Yamagata University who has studied the juhyo for nearly two decades, warns that the frost is increasingly mixed with acid, spelling danger for the trees’ future.

This year, he recorded the highest levels of acid so far, “which could have severe ramifications on the ecosystem”, he said.

Looking at satellite data, he and another professor, Junichi Kudo of Tohoku University, concluded that the acid in the trees came from sulfur produced at factories in Shanxi province .

Since he first wrote about his research in a scientific journal in 2006, elementary-school teachers have asked him to give lectures to local children.

“It’s hard to explain this kind of scientific evidence to children, but finally they seem to come up with the same question: `What are you going to do about the problem?'” Professor Yanagisawa said.

He regretted that he had no good answer.

“The pollution comes from outside Japan. There’s a limit to what local residents here can do.”

Mount Zao is only one example of pollution hitting Japan from China, where factory emissions are causing international concern as China’s economy surges ahead.

Some schools in southern Japan and South Korea have occasionally curbed activities because of toxic chemical smog from China’s factories or sandstorms from the Gobi Desert caused by deforestation.

Environmental ministers of China, Japan and South Korea agreed last year to look jointly at the problem, but Tokyo has accused Beijing of secrecy.

“About yellow sand, I am not quite sure how and why it can be regarded as a national secret,” Japanese Environment Minister Ichiro Kamoshita said in February.

Scrap Import Tariffs On Green Machines

Scrap import tariffs on green machines, Paulson tells Beijing

Bloomberg – Updated on Apr 04, 2008

US Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson has urged the mainland to drop tariffs on environmental equipment, saying trade barriers are hindering efforts to clean up a country that the World Bank says has 16 of the world’s 20 most polluted cities.

“There’s something that doesn’t seem economically sensible and morally right” about charging a tariff on clean technology, Mr Paulson said after his speech on energy and the environment at the Chinese Academy of Sciences yesterday.

“In China, I hear from government officials about the need for US technology to help clean up China’s rivers and control pollution from China’s many smokestacks, but that technology can be expensive, in part due to tariffs and non-tariff barriers,” he said. “We have a shared interest in resolving these dilemmas, and we can solve them.”

He said imported water membrane technology could help reduce river pollution from power plants.

The Ministry of Commerce did not immediately comment.

Mr Paulson said China and the US – the world’s biggest emitters of greenhouse gases – must work together to cut their dependence on oil and increase energy security.

The nations signed a deal in December to ensure imports and exports met environmental protection law standards, and pledged to co-operate to promote alternative fuel technologies for cars. Since then, they have been fleshing out the accord, Mr Paulson said.

He praised efforts to reduce the amount of energy used per unit of gross domestic product, but said more needed to be done. He urged Beijing to lift price controls on electricity and fuel which he said upset “the natural equilibrium of markets to match supply and demand”.

Washington this week rejected Beijing’s proposal for developed countries to contribute a percentage of their GDP to offset the impact of climate change.

Mr Paulson is meeting leaders appointed to the cabinet last month to prepare for the next round of bilateral talks on economics and trade. He and mainland leaders have also discussed topics ranging from the authorities’ response to unrest in Tibet to the strength of the yuan. Yesterday he described the rise in value of the mainland currency as “good”.

The mainland’s economy grew 11.2 per cent in the fourth quarter of last year and was the biggest contributor to global growth last year, according to International Monetary Fund estimates.