Clear The Air News Blog Rotating Header Image

Vehicle

Officials urged to heed WHO diesel warning

SCMP

News that fumes raises cancer risk means officials should clean up and reduce diesel fleet, groups say
Dennis Chong
Jun 14, 2012

The government should cut the number of diesel-powered vehicles on the streets, and make the remainder less polluting, to protect pedestrians now the World Health Organisation has classified diesel fumes as a cause of cancer, lobby groups say.

WHO experts said that the more diesel exhaust fumes people breathed in, the more they risked getting lung and bladder cancer.

At the end of March, about 130,000 diesel-powered vehicles were registered in Hong Kong.

The Clean Air Network and think tank Civic Exchange claim the government has been too slow in toughening environmental standards for diesel engines.

Clean Air said the WHO’s decision reinforced the need for the government to set out policies to encourage the use of cleaner fuel.

According to the group, more than 80 per cent of diesel vehicles have engines that meet the emissions standards in force in the EU before the year 2000. These pre-Euro-IV- standard vehicles account for most of the city’s emissions of two key pollutants, being responsible for 88 per cent of pollutant particles in the air and 76 per cent of nitrogen oxide.

The European Union has introduced progressively tighter emission standards for vehicles since 1992. Its Euro V standard for buses and trucks was introduced in 2008; the Euro VI standard comes in next year.

Clean Air general manager Helen Choy Shuk-yi said bus companies had been reluctant to upgrade their vehicles on cost grounds.

Mike Kilburn, of Civic Exchange, said it was crucial officials speed up the phasing out of old diesel vehicles.

He also said the government may not be fully informed on the emission levels of construction machinery and other equipment, such as diggers and cranes. “There is no standard for [their] maintenance,” he said.

The government must respond to the WHO findings since people could now easily understand the harm diesel exhaust fumes cause, Kilburn said.

An Environment Bureau spokesman said it had noted the WHO decision and would consider measures to tighten controls. He also said the government was planning new laws to control emissions from machinery and equipment.

The WHO said that while the risk of getting cancer from diesel fumes was small, since so many people breathed in the fumes in some way, raising the status of diesel exhaust to carcinogen from “probable carcinogen” was an important shift.

The WHO’s updated stance was based partly on the findings of a study conducted by the US National Cancer Institute/National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, which found that a wide exposure to diesel-related emissions by 12,300 underground miners increased their risk of death from lung cancer.

Choy said she expected the WHO to revise its pollution benchmarks along with the latest decision.

“Hong Kong will then fall far short of international standards in terms of its air quality benchmarks,” she said.

The government says it will toughen air-quality targets in 2014.

dennis.chong@scmp.com

DIESEL EXHAUST

What is diesel exhaust?
What chemicals are found in diesel exhaust?
Diesel exhaust is a mixture of over 400 different fine particles, vapors, and toxic
organic materials, that result when diesel fuel is burned. Over 40 chemicals in diesel
exhaust are considered toxic air contaminants (TAC) by the State of California.

What is diesel exhaust?What chemicals are found in diesel exhaust?Diesel exhaust is a mixture of over 400 different fine particles, vapors, and toxicorganic materials, that result when diesel fuel is burned. Over 40 chemicals in dieselexhaust are considered toxic air contaminants (TAC) by the State of California.

Download PDF : diesel_english

Particulate Emissions from Diesel-Fueled Engines as a Toxic Air Contaminant

The staffs of the Air Resources Board (ARB or Board) and the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) have been evaluating diesel exhaust since 1989 under California’s air toxics program, for potential identification as a toxic air contaminant (TAC). A draft report was first released in June 1994, for public review and comment. A revised draft report was released in May 1997. A third draft report was report released for public review in February 1998. The February 1998 report was formally reviewed and approved by the Scientific Review Panel (SRP) at its April 22, 1998, meeting.

The final report and a staff report are available in our “formal” rulemaking activity referenced below.

Fact Sheets

HEARING ACTION AND SUPPLEMENTAL 15-DAY NOTICES
  • ·        Notice of Public Availability of Modified Text (PDF – 4K)
  • ·        Resolution 98-35 (PDF – 20K)

o   Attachment A: Scientific Review Panel Chairman’s Cover Letter and Panel Findings on Proposed Identification of Diesel Exhaust as a Toxic Air Contaminant

§  SRP Chairman’s Cover Letter (PDF – 6K) and

§  The SRP Findings of Diesel Exhaust (PDF – 33K)

o   Attachment B: Proposed Regulation Order (PDF – 7K)


PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE AND RELATED MATERIALS
  • ·        Cover Letter (PDF – 10K)
  • ·        Public Hearing Notice(PDF – 18K)
  • ·        Staff Report: Initial Statement of Reasons (PDF – 111K), which summarizes the scientific basis for the proposed regulation and includes a discussion of the environmental and economic impacts of the proposal.

o   Appendix I: (Proposed Regulation Order) (Staff Report)

o   Appendix II: (Findings of the SRP) (Staff Report) and

o   Appendix III: (SRP-Approved Version) of the:

§  Executive Summary (PDF – 152K)

§  Part A (Exposure Assessment) (PDF – 594K)

§  Part B (Health Risk Assessment for Diesel Exhaust) (PDF – 1,995K)

§  Part C (Responses to Comments)

June 1994 Comment Period

ARB (PDF – 45K)
OEHHA (PDF – 573K)


May 1997 Comment Period

ARB (PDF – 37K)
OEHHA

(pp. 1-154) (PDF – 539K)
(pp. 155-231) (PDF – 252K)


February 1998 Comment Period

ARB (PDF – 91K)
OEHHA (PDF – 359K)

Part A, prepared by the ARB staff, is an evaluation of emissions of, and exposure to, diesel exhaust. Part B, prepared by the OEHHA staff, assesses the health effects of diesel exhaust. Part C consists of copies of the public comments received on the June 1994, May 1997, and February 1998 draft reports, and the ARB / OEHHA staff responses. Because of the size and format of the comment letters as well as the Appendices to Part A, they were not included on this page. Part A Appendices and Part C (public comment letters) are available by contacting Kathy Spring at (916) 323-3485

Health Effects of Diesel Exhaust

Diesel fuel is widely used throughout our society. It powers trucks that deliver products to our
communities, buses that carry us to school and work, agricultural equipment that plants and harvests
our food, and backup generators that can provide electricity during emergencies. It is also used for
many other applications. Diesel engines have historically been more versatile and cheaper to run
than gasoline engines or other sources of power. Unfortunately, the exhaust from these engines
contains substances that can pose a risk to human health.
In 1998, the California Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard
Assessment (OEHHA) completed a comprehensive health assessment of diesel exhaust. This
assessment formed the basis for a decision by the California Air Resources Board (ARB) to formally
identify particles in diesel exhaust as a toxic air contaminant that may pose a threat to human health.
The American Lung Association of California (ALAC) and its 15 local associations work to prevent
lung disease and promote lung health. Since 1904, the
American Lung Association has been fighting lung
disease through education, community service, advocacy
and research.
This fact sheet by OEHHA and ALAC provides
information on health hazards associated with diesel
exhaust.

Diesel fuel is widely used throughout our society. It powers trucks that deliver products to ourcommunities, buses that carry us to school and work, agricultural equipment that plants and harvestsour food, and backup generators that can provide electricity during emergencies. It is also used formany other applications. Diesel engines have historically been more versatile and cheaper to runthan gasoline engines or other sources of power. Unfortunately, the exhaust from these enginescontains substances that can pose a risk to human health.In 1998, the California Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of Environmental Health HazardAssessment (OEHHA) completed a comprehensive health assessment of diesel exhaust. Thisassessment formed the basis for a decision by the California Air Resources Board (ARB) to formallyidentify particles in diesel exhaust as a toxic air contaminant that may pose a threat to human health.The American Lung Association of California (ALAC) and its 15 local associations work to preventlung disease and promote lung health. Since 1904, theAmerican Lung Association has been fighting lungdisease through education, community service, advocacyand research.This fact sheet by OEHHA and ALAC providesinformation on health hazards associated with dieselexhaust.

Download PDF : diesel4-02

Dutch subsidy for Euro VI trucks and buses

In the Netherlands, heavy-duty vehicles(trucks and buses) that meet the new Euro

VI standards will be subsidised by up to 4500 euro each in 2012 and 2013. The Euro

VI standards will become mandatory for all new heavy-duty vehicles from 2014.

Tests by the Dutch environment consultancy TNO have shown that the new

Euro VI engines can reduce emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx) by more than

90 per cent in real driving conditions, as compared to Euro V and earlier Eurostandard

engines.

Source: Dutch government press release, 30 May 2012.

Link: http://www.rijksoverheid.nl/nieuws/2012/05/30/subsidie-voor-schoonste-trucks-en-bussen.html

IARC: DIESEL ENGINE EXHAUST CARCINOGENIC

Lyon, France, June 12, 2012 ‐‐ After a week-long meeting of international experts, the International
Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), which is part of the World Health Organization (WHO), today
classified diesel engine exhaust as carcinogenic to humans (Group 1), based on sufficient evidence
that exposure is associated with an increased risk for lung cancer.
Background
In 1988, IARC classified diesel exhaust as probably carcinogenic to humans (Group 2A). An Advisory Group
which reviews and recommends future priorities for the IARC Monographs Program had recommended
diesel exhaust as a high priority for re-evaluation since 1998.
There has been mounting concern about the cancer-causing potential of diesel exhaust, particularly based
on findings in epidemiological studies of workers exposed in various settings. This was re-emphasized by
the publication in March 2012 of the results of a large US National Cancer Institute/National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health study of occupational exposure to such emissions in underground miners,
which showed an increased risk of death from lung cancer in exposed workers (1).

Lyon, France, June 12, 2012 ‐‐ After a week-long meeting of international experts, the InternationalAgency for Research on Cancer (IARC), which is part of the World Health Organization (WHO), todayclassified diesel engine exhaust as carcinogenic to humans (Group 1), based on sufficient evidencethat exposure is associated with an increased risk for lung cancer.BackgroundIn 1988, IARC classified diesel exhaust as probably carcinogenic to humans (Group 2A). An Advisory Groupwhich reviews and recommends future priorities for the IARC Monographs Program had recommendeddiesel exhaust as a high priority for re-evaluation since 1998.There has been mounting concern about the cancer-causing potential of diesel exhaust, particularly basedon findings in epidemiological studies of workers exposed in various settings. This was re-emphasized bythe publication in March 2012 of the results of a large US National Cancer Institute/National Institute forOccupational Safety and Health study of occupational exposure to such emissions in underground miners,which showed an increased risk of death from lung cancer in exposed workers (1).

Download PDF : diesel exhaust carcinogenic

Diesel fumes cause cancer: WHO

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/news/print.cfm?objectid=10812719

Description: WHO says diesel fumes are as big a public health threat as passive smoking. Photo / Thinkstock

WHO says diesel fumes are as big a public health threat as passive smoking. Photo / Thinkstock

Diesel fumes cause cancer, the World Health Organisation’s (WHO) cancer agency says, a ruling that could make exhaust as important a public health threat as passive smoking.

The risk of getting cancer from diesel fumes is small, but since so many people breathe in the fumes in some way, the science panel said raising the status of diesel exhaust to carcinogen from “probable carcinogen” was an important shift.

“It’s on the same order of magnitude as passive smoking,” said Kurt Straif, director of the IARC department that evaluates cancer risks. “This could be another big push for countries to clean up exhaust from diesel engines.”

Since so many people are exposed to exhaust, Straif said there could be many cases of lung cancer connected to the contaminant. He said the fumes affected groups including pedestrians on the street, ship passengers and crew, railroad workers, truck drivers, mechanics, miners and people operating heavy machinery.

The new classification followed a weeklong discussion in Lyon, France, by an expert panel organised by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. The panel’s decision stands as the ruling for the IARC, the cancer arm of WHO.

The last time the agency considered the status of diesel exhaust was in 1989, when it was labelled a “probable” carcinogen. Reclassifying diesel exhaust as carcinogenic puts it into the same category as other known hazards such as asbestos, alcohol and ultraviolet radiation.

Experts in Lyon analysed published studies, evidence from animals and limited research in humans. One of the biggest studies was published in March by the US National Cancer Institute. That paper looked at 12,300 miners for several decades starting in 1947. Researchers found that miners heavily exposed to diesel exhaust had a higher risk of dying from lung cancer.

A person’s risk for cancer depends on many variables, from genetic makeup to the amount and length of time of exposure to dangerous substances.

– AP

Copyright ©2012, APN Holdings NZ Limited

More vehicles escape idling ban

Top official uses her powers to approve an exemption on medical grounds, but lawmaker is unhappy that public was kept in the dark
Cheung Chi-fai
Jun 05, 2012

The director of environmental protection has quietly exercised discretionary powers to introduce a new exemption to the already much diluted ban on idling engines.

The change, approved by Anissa Wong Sean-yee on April 30, came into force on May 11 when it wasgazetted without prior publicity, and adds about 200 vehicles to those able to keep their engines running in the streets.

Drivers of private light buses for an organisation carrying people who are physically or mentally disabled, and drivers of a mobile clinic providing medical consultations on board, can apply for the exemption.

The changes are the first since the ban, aimed at cutting air pollution, took effect in December, much watered-down from the original version after lobbying from the transport trade.

It drew criticism from Democratic Party lawmaker Kam Nai-wai, who said such changes should be posted on the department’s website to allow public comment.

Kam urged the department to explain clearly the criteria it used to approve the exemption and how many vehicles were involved.

“The public has the right to know under what conditions an approval is likely to prevent abuse of power.”

A spokesman for the department said the director had discretion to exempt a driver or class of drivers if she was “satisfied that exceptional circumstances exist that make it impractical or unreasonable for drivers to comply”.

But the spokesman would not say how many exemption applications Wong had received or how many were still being processed. He noted that lawmakers had supported granting exemptions on individual merit.

Drivers already enjoy a three-minute grace period and a general exemption when the weather is poor, such as during rainstorm or very hot weather warnings.

During the legislature’s debate on the idling engine ban, environment officials rejected suggestions that a general exemption should be granted to people with health problems, as it might be abused and make enforcement difficult.

The spokesman said six welfare agencies had been granted the exemption: the Hong Kong Society for Rehabilitation, the Salvation Army Hoi Yu Day Care Centre for Senior Citizens, the Christian Family Service Centre, United Christian Nethersole Community Health Service, the Salvation Army Tai Po Multi-service Centre for Senior Citizens, and the Tung Wah Group of Hospitals.

“It is necessary to maintain ventilation inside the vehicle cabin with the air conditioner, as the passengers on board may not be able to properly take care of themselves, open the windows or get out of the vehicle when [it] is waiting for other passengers,” the spokesman said.

Yan Oi Tong and the Hong Kong Federation of Trade Unions Workers’ Medical Clinics are also given exemptions for their mobile clinics to ensure equipment is supplied with power and to provide ventilation for waiting patients.

The spokesman said there was no legal definition of mobile clinics and an individual assessment of the merit of exempting them was needed.

A spokeswoman for the Tung Wah Group said exemptions for the 54 private light buses it operates for the elderly and disabled were necessary as “they are vulnerable to high temperature”.

“In more serious situations, they may even run the risk of epilepsy or loss of consciousness,” Ava Ho, the groups’ assistant manager of corporate communication, said.

Yan Oi Tong’s spokeswoman said the organisation had 17 vehicles, including a 24-seat private bus, and a five-tonne truck.

chifai.cheung@scmp.com

Euro V vehicle emission standards for newly registered vehicles to take effect on June 1

Hong Kong (HKSAR) – The Euro V vehicle emission standards for newly registered vehicles will come into effect starting from June 1 (Friday).

A spokesman for the Environmental Protection Department today (May 29) said that pursuant to the Air Pollution Control (Vehicle Design Standards) (Emission) (Amendment) Regulation 2012, all newly registered vehicles, except diesel light goods vehicles of design weight not more than 3.5 tonnes, will have to comply with the new emission standards starting from June 1, while the remaining vehicle class will be required to meet the new emissions standard starting from December 31.

Euro V petrol or LPG vehicles emit about 30 per cent less nitrogen oxides (NOx) than their Euro IV counterparts. Compared with Euro IV vehicles, Euro V diesel heavy duty vehicles (i.e. those of vehicle weight over 3.5 tonnes) emit about 40 per cent less NOx.

For smaller diesel vehicles, Euro V models emit about 80 per cent less respirable suspended particulates and 30 per cent less NOx.

The spokesman said that to improve air quality, it is the Government’s policy to introduce the most stringent motor vehicle fuel and emission standards as soon as practicable. The prevailing Euro IV vehicle emission standards for newly registered vehicles were introduced in January 2006. The Government implemented Euro V motor fuel standards on July 1, 2010 and adopted a phased introduction of Euro V emission standards to take into account of the supply of compliant vehicles on the local market.

Source: HKSAR Government

Hong Kong Implements Euro V Emissions Standards

http://www.findadblue.com/news/2012/5/31/hong-kong-implements-euro-v-emissions-standards/

From 1 June 2012, Hong Kong will apply Euro V diesel emissions standards to newly registered vehicles. The ruling, part of the Air Pollution Control Regulation 2012, will apply to heavy-duty vehicles over 3.5 tonnes. Those vehicles already registered will have to meet the standards from 31 December 2012.

Previously, Hong Kong had applied Euro IV standards since January 2006. Heavy-duty Euro V vehicles with diesel engines emit about 40% less Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) than those produced to Euro IV standards.

Euro V regulations permit a maximum emission of 2 grams per kilowatt-hour of NOx. AdBlue is an essential part of reducing NOx emissions where SCR technology is used.

Announcing this legislation development on Wednesday 29th May, a spokesman for Hong Kong’s Environmental Protection Department also said that it is Government policy to introduce the most stringent diesel emissions standards as soon as it is practical to do so.

Hong Kong’s progression to Euro V stands in sharp contrast to mainland China, which has delayedimplementation of China IV (equivalent to Euro IV) until July 2013.

This entry was written by Lucy Terry and posted on 31 May 2012