Clear The Air News Blog Rotating Header Image

Diesel

Green Vehicle Scheme Stalls

May Chan – Updated on May 30, 2008 – SCMP

A HK$3.2 billion subsidy scheme to encourage owners of trucks and buses to replace them with eco-friendly equivalents has attracted just 9 per cent of eligible vehicles.

The scheme, launched in April last year, had received 5,681 applications by the end of last month, the Environmental Protection Department said yesterday.

Some 5,355 of these were approved, involving HK$216 million in subsidies.

A total of 74,000 are eligible under the scheme, and owners can claim a grant of between HK$17,000 and HK$173,000 if they get rid of vehicles built before the European Union introduced limits on vehicle emissions in 1992 (Euro I standard) and replace them with cleaner Euro IV models.

Leung Hung, chairman of the Hong Kong, Kowloon and New Territories Public and Maxicab Light Bus Merchants United Association, said the government had not carried out enough consultation.

He claimed Euro IV vehicles were not suitable for places with heavy traffic congestion, such as Hong Kong.

“Many of the users of Euro IV models told us they have to spend at least an extra HK$1,000 on petrol,” Mr Leung said. “These models are supposed to drive smoothly at high speed … but in Hong Kong it is not possible. So the vehicles end up consuming more petrol than they should because they never achieve optimum [operating] level.

“The government was too hasty in launching the scheme … it should have studied more about the Euro IV models of vehicles and the needs of the end users.”

His view was shared by Lai Ming-hung, spokesman for the Taxi and Public Light Bus Concern Group. Mr Lai said the subsidy was too meagre, as it covered less than half the replacement cost.

Lawmaker Audrey Eu Yuet-mee, chairwoman of the Legislative Council’s environmental affairs panel, said the scheme was doomed to fail because it was “made behind closed doors”. She urged the government to launch more drastic measures to improve vehicle pollution, such as electronic road pricing.

A spokesman for the Environmental Protection Department said the government planned to give the scheme more publicity to encourage more people to apply.

Pollution Danger Higher Than Earlier Estimated

Estimating Premature DeathsJane Kay, Chronicle Environment Writer – Friday, May 23, 2008

Pollution from cars on the Bay Area’s congested highways …

Microscopic air pollutants from trucks, cars, power plants and wood burning may pose greater health problems than previously believed, according to state researchers.

The new estimates were released Thursday in response to a request from the California Air Resources Board, which was seeking up-to-date research on premature deaths associated with inhaling particles one-thirtieth the width of a strand of hair.

Based on 60 studies worldwide and advice from a team of experts, including the World Health Organization, the researchers concluded that the new risk factor for fine-particle pollution is 70 percent higher than previously estimated.

The report, also reviewed by scientists at UC Berkeley, could serve as the basis for strengthening state – and perhaps federal – air-quality regulations.

“Particle pollution is a silent killer,” state Air Resources Board Chairwoman Mary Nichols said after receiving the report Thursday at a board meeting in Fresno.

Most of the premature deaths linked to California’s bad air occur in regions surrounding San Francisco Bay, Los Angeles and the San Joaquin Valley. The drop in fine particulates statewide in the last decade, particularly in cities, has been 30 percent.

One region that saw even greater improvement, the San Joaquin Valley, decreased 45 percent over the same time period due to new regulations, according to state air officials. The board added even more regulations Thursday by restricting wood burning to up to 35 days in the winter as well as requiring employers to start carpools.
Direct link

The state’s study found a direct correlation between increased pollution from specks of dust, soot, metals and soil and a greater number of hospitalizations, emergency visits and missed school days.

Health problems were generally related to respiratory illnesses and heart disease. Some studies reported bouts of asthma and bronchitis. Even small increases can affect children, the elderly and people with chronic diseases, researchers say.

The cost of hospitalizations, physician visits and lost work days connected to airborne specks of dust and tiny droplets could reach $70 billion a year, health officials said.

Numbers of premature deaths are difficult to estimate because the scientific knowledge isn’t far enough along to determine a safe level of the tiny particles. California’s average small-particle concentration is about 14 micrograms of PM2.5, or particles less than 2.5 micrometers in diameter, per cubic meter of air. The San Francisco Bay’s average over the past three years is 10.69 micrograms.

Assuming that a safe level is 7 micrograms of PM2.5 per cubic meter of air – half as clean as the state’s air – means that there would still be about 14,000 to 24,000 premature deaths every year in the state associated with these small particles, the study said. That is two to three times the number of deaths previously predicted.

Currently, the cleanest cities in the country generally measure 7 micrograms of PM2.5 per cubic meters of air in the atmosphere.

At that level, there would still be 1,800 to 3,200 deaths a year in the Bay Area; 8,100 to 14,000 in the Los Angeles region, and 2,000 to 3,500 in the San Joaquin Valley.

“The risk in a highly polluted area is similar to living with a smoker,” said Bart Croes, the board’s chief of research.

The forest fires burning in the Santa Cruz Mountains can cause serious health problems for people breathing in the smoke, he said. The assessments on premature deaths in the study include the effects of California fires in the last few years.

Fine particles – whether from fires or industrial emissions or traffic – penetrate deeply into the lung and inflame the lung tissue. There is evidence that they can cross the tissue into the blood stream, and accumulate in the organs.

Scientists today believe that it’s the size that causes the problem. However, research continues to see if materials in the particles such as metals or other toxic compounds may be the ones most responsible for the damage to the body.
Cancer study

Most of the studies used in the re-evaluation were epidemiological studies. Included in the report was an American Cancer Society study of 300,000 people in cities nationwide. Over 18 years, the cancer society looked at people who lived in cities that had low levels of small particulate matter and compared them to people who lived in cities with higher levels.

Researchers looked at diet, smoking habits and other factors in trying to isolate the pollution effects, which Croes noted was a difficult task.

As part of the assessment, they looked at changes in death rates during a coal-burning ban in Dublin, Ireland, sulfur dioxide reduction under new regulations in Hong Kong and a steel mill strike in Utah Valley.

Representatives of the Western States Petroleum Association said they hadn’t yet evaluated the draft of the study. The California Truckers Association, which is expected to comment, didn’t respond to queries from The Chronicle.

The air board will accept comments until July 11. The study could be accepted by the board as early as August.
See the study

Read the draft study on premature deaths associated with fine particulates.

E-mail Jane Kay at jkay@sfchronicle.com.

This article appeared on page B – 1 of the San Francisco Chronicle

Pollution Danger Higher Than Earlier Estimated

Jane Kay, Chronicle Environment Writer – Friday, May 23, 2008 – San Fransisco Chronical

Microscopic air pollutants from trucks, cars, power plants and wood burning may pose greater health problems than previously believed, according to state researchers.

The new estimates were released Thursday in response to a request from the California Air Resources Board, which was seeking up-to-date research on premature deaths associated with inhaling particles one-thirtieth the width of a strand of hair.

Based on 60 studies worldwide and advice from a team of experts, including the World Health Organization, the researchers concluded that the new risk factor for fine-particle pollution is 70 percent higher than previously estimated.

The report, also reviewed by scientists at UC Berkeley, could serve as the basis for strengthening state – and perhaps federal – air-quality regulations.

“Particle pollution is a silent killer,” state Air Resources Board Chairwoman Mary Nichols said after receiving the report Thursday at a board meeting in Fresno.

Most of the premature deaths linked to California’s bad air occur in regions surrounding San Francisco Bay, Los Angeles and the San Joaquin Valley. The drop in fine particulates statewide in the last decade, particularly in cities, has been 30 percent.

One region that saw even greater improvement, the San Joaquin Valley, decreased 45 percent over the same time period due to new regulations, according to state air officials. The board added even more regulations Thursday by restricting wood burning to up to 35 days in the winter as well as requiring employers to start carpools.

Direct link

The state’s study found a direct correlation between increased pollution from specks of dust, soot, metals and soil and a greater number of hospitalizations, emergency visits and missed school days.

Health problems were generally related to respiratory illnesses and heart disease. Some studies reported bouts of asthma and bronchitis. Even small increases can affect children, the elderly and people with chronic diseases, researchers say.

The cost of hospitalizations, physician visits and lost work days connected to airborne specks of dust and tiny droplets could reach $70 billion a year, health officials said.

Numbers of premature deaths are difficult to estimate because the scientific knowledge isn’t far enough along to determine a safe level of the tiny particles. California’s average small-particle concentration is about 14 micrograms of PM2.5, or particles less than 2.5 micrometers in diameter, per cubic meter of air. The San Francisco Bay’s average over the past three years is 10.69 micrograms.

Assuming that a safe level is 7 micrograms of PM2.5 per cubic meter of air – half as clean as the state’s air – means that there would still be about 14,000 to 24,000 premature deaths every year in the state associated with these small particles, the study said. That is two to three times the number of deaths previously predicted.

Currently, the cleanest cities in the country generally measure 7 micrograms of PM2.5 per cubic meters of air in the atmosphere.

At that level, there would still be 1,800 to 3,200 deaths a year in the Bay Area; 8,100 to 14,000 in the Los Angeles region, and 2,000 to 3,500 in the San Joaquin Valley.

“The risk in a highly polluted area is similar to living with a smoker,” said Bart Croes, the board’s chief of research.

The forest fires burning in the Santa Cruz Mountains can cause serious health problems for people breathing in the smoke, he said. The assessments on premature deaths in the study include the effects of California fires in the last few years.

Fine particles – whether from fires or industrial emissions or traffic – penetrate deeply into the lung and inflame the lung tissue. There is evidence that they can cross the tissue into the blood stream, and accumulate in the organs.

Scientists today believe that it’s the size that causes the problem. However, research continues to see if materials in the particles such as metals or other toxic compounds may be the ones most responsible for the damage to the body.

Cancer study

Most of the studies used in the re-evaluation were epidemiological studies. Included in the report was an American Cancer Society study of 300,000 people in cities nationwide. Over 18 years, the cancer society looked at people who lived in cities that had low levels of small particulate matter and compared them to people who lived in cities with higher levels.

Researchers looked at diet, smoking habits and other factors in trying to isolate the pollution effects, which Croes noted was a difficult task.

As part of the assessment, they looked at changes in death rates during a coal-burning ban in Dublin, Ireland, sulfur dioxide reduction under new regulations in Hong Kong and a steel mill strike in Utah Valley.

Representatives of the Western States Petroleum Association said they hadn’t yet evaluated the draft of the study. The California Truckers Association, which is expected to comment, didn’t respond to queries from The Chronicle.

The air board will accept comments until July 11. The study could be accepted by the board as early as August.

See the study

Read the draft study on premature deaths associated with fine particulates:

E-mail Jane Kay at jkay@sfchronicle.com.

Tokyo Comparisons With Hong Kong

Urban Jungle

Celebrity vet Eric Lai shares his views on society through the eyes of animals. Give him your feedback at urbanjungle@scmp.com

Dr Eric – Updated on May 16, 2008 – SCMP

This week: Tokyo observations

Here is my chance to be a foreign correspondent. Well, not quite a real one. There’s nothing dramatic happening around here. I am not dodging artillery shells and there isn’t any risk of me stepping on a live mine. I’m writing this week’s column from a coffee shop on the streets of Shinjuku, Tokyo. I’m here on a personal mission – to acquire some fancy surgical equipment and to stuff my face with Japanese food.

I’ve been here for two days now and that isn’t enough time to make any conclusions about Japan, its people and its ways. But I have seen some things I like and I am going to make some comparisons with Hong Kong that Hongkongers can appreciate.

I arrived at Narita airport and I went directly by the express train to Tokyo. I had to wait a little for the train to arrive, so I had some time to work out my train connection to the suburb where my hotel was. I stood in front of a poster displaying a bewildering array of rail lines that criss-cross Tokyo and extend out into the hinterland. Given the country’s long love affair with railways, I wasn’t surprised. One of the measures of success of imperialist countries during wartime was the size of its railway network.

In fact, one of the reasons for the first Sino-Japanese war (1894-95) was tension over railway tracks in Korea. After the war Russia and Japan began a race to build railway networks in China. The Russians and Japanese strong-armed the Qing dynasty to allow them to build tracks that extended all the way to Vladivostok and the Japanese to build through Korea and down the coast of China. Soon after this rail race the Russo-Japanese war began, in 1904, and the first thing the Japanese took over was a major rail junction at Yongsan-gu in Seoul.

This emphasis on the importance of the rail system led to the extensive use of rail after the war for both transport and industrialisation. This is easily seen in the rail system in place today. To put it in perspective, Hong Kong has more than 200km of railway, while Tokyo alone has more than 1,100km.

The Tokyo system took a little getting used to but I reached my destination with little trouble. During my stay I noticed that train stations were not separated by much distance, which made travel by car almost unnecessary.

The second thing I noticed as I left the train and stepped onto the footpaths of Tokyo was the lack of haze and pollution. While there was a stiff breeze that day, I’m sure the main reason was the lack of street traffic and the Pearl River Delta industrial area. And while there is an extensive bus system in the city, the density of buses on the streets compared to Hong Kong was much lower. As a result roadside pollution on main thoroughfares was much lower.

Given this observation I would certainly lend support to extending the existing rail system in Hong Kong to more areas such as Island South and eastern New Territories. Also, with more than 10 railway companies operating, there is stiff competition for Tokyo passengers. Many of the companies operate at the same or adjacent stations, so passengers can choose between them. The existing and planned extension of the rail system in Hong Kong, further entrenching the current monopoly, means uncompetitive prices in the future.

While dragging my luggage through the streets of Tokyo in search of my hotel and getting lost in the process, I noticed the number of people riding bikes on the pedestrian walkways and the number of bikes parked on footpaths. Surprisingly, there were no locks or chains on any of the bikes, so I assume bike thieves are uncommon. I guess the city has the luxury of space, which allows a bike culture. The footpaths are much wider and can accommodate bike riders, and wherever the road is wide enough, a generous proportion is given over to cycle tracks.

Given the pleasant, low polluted and bike-safe road environment, I would probably want to ride a bike to work if I lived in Tokyo. Civic planners trying to make a greener Hong Kong should look at this. Hong Kong’s small size makes it perfectly suited for biking, as the distances are shorter, and there is no greener or healthier form of transport.

Another luxury the abundance of space in Tokyo allows is plenty of large and beautifully kept parks. On my second day the weather was wonderful and hot and I found a beautiful stretch of lawn on which to frolic. Just sitting there watching the world going by was a luxury I have rarely been able to enjoy since my university days in Melbourne. The lack of public spaces in Hong Kong should be addressed seriously. The recent fiasco of the locking away of public open spaces from the public is only a symptom of a much more malignant disease.

There is much more to like in Tokyo, which I will save for next week’s column.

Law Aims To Cut Sulphur-Dioxide Emissions

Environmental Protection Department

The new law requiring the use of ultra low sulphur diesel in industrial and commercial processes will be tabled to lawmakers on May 21, the Environmental Protection Department says. If endorsed, it will take effect from October 1, cutting local sulphur-dioxide emissions by about 2,480 tonnes a year.

The Air Pollution Control (Fuel Restriction) (Amendment) Regulations, gazetted today, mandates the use of clean diesel with sulphur content of no more than 0.005 % by weight in industrial and commercial processes.

Sulphur dioxide is a major pollutant responsible for respiratory illness. It plays a significant role in causing regional air pollution and reacts with other chemicals in the atmosphere and transforms into fine particles which impair visibility and contribute to smog formation.

The Hong Kong Government and the Guangdong Provincial Government reached a consensus in 2002 to cut sulphur dioxide emissions 40% by 2010, using 1997 as the base year. The new law will help reach the reduction target, enabling Hong Kong to improve the smog problem, air quality and public health.

It will also bring Hong Kong to the forefront of using clean fuel: At present, nowhere in the world is clean fuel being used in this comprehensive manner.

The new law will not cause any major impact on the operational environment of the industrial and commercial sectors. It could create a ‘win-win’ situation for the environment and the business sector, showing that protecting the environment need not be at the expense of economic growth.

Improving Air Quality For The Sake Of People’s Health

A clean sweep

Updated on May 01, 2008 – SCMP

Joining things up into a coherent whole is never easy but it is a mark of competence. First of all, you need to have a clear focus of what the endgame is and then you need to understand what needs to be done to get there. The rest is about implementation.

New reports last week noted Hong Kong’s very poor roadside air quality. Despite a decade of effort, conditions remain a daily threat to the public health of this city’s people. Government spin focuses on “achievements” – that there have been some reductions in pollutant levels, based on levels of a certain year in the past. In reality, absolute levels remain very high and, when compared with the World Health Organisation’s recommended air quality standards, Hong Kong’s street-level air quality is positively dangerous.

Instead of recounting how well officials rearranged the deck chairs on the Titanic, the government may want to ask itself how it could have averted the roadside air crisis over the past decade. There is no point repeating what it has done – we know officials switched taxis and most minibuses from diesel to LPG, and ultra-low-sulphur diesel has been made available, for example – but the measures have not been enough. So, with the benefit of hindsight, we should ask: if our officials had to do it all over again, what other steps would they have taken?

The answer is that they should have taken numerous, related steps that affect roadside air quality. If the government wants to have any chance of cleaning up our roadside air, it needs to not only focus on what comes out of exhausts but also to change direction. Measures include taking the oldest, most-polluting trucks off the road, and converting buses running along urban routes to run on natural gas.

A more challenging solution is to reduce vehicles on our roads altogether. This means investing in railways, which is finally happening now but, until relatively recently, the emphasis had been on building roads. It also requires officials to co-ordinate road and rail interchanges so people opt to take the train into denser urban areas, and fewer empty buses. That kind of co-ordination requires a clear focus on the public health endgame.

That hasn’t happened, because officials were focused elsewhere. Their priority was roads. Even though some corner of the bureaucracy knew that Hong Kong must follow a rail-led public transport policy – which had been articulated – it was not followed in practice because some other parts of the administration built roads and were sympathetic to providing cheap road transport. The government could just as well have provided cheaper rail transport by subsidising rail construction to keep fares down, which it seems to be finally doing.

The city’s topography poses another challenge. Urban areas are dominated by tall buildings and narrow streets with heavy traffic. Emissions from vehicles gets trapped in “street canyons” that become extremely polluted and endanger public health. The solution for cleaning the city air should have involved a change in urban planning, in which vehicles were removed from the picture through massive pedestrian schemes. Again, officials have been too timid. There have only been small-scale schemes here and there. Instead, officials have allowed the “walled-buildings” phenomenon to spread across the city. In addition to street canyons, we now have massive buildings blocking air circulation in many places.

The failure in all these policy areas to fight roadside pollution is the reason for this crisis. Our officials continue to avoid admitting publicly that our roadside air quality is extremely poor. If they did, pressure would mount on them to take action. But they cannot connect all the dots for what needs to be done because there is no policy focus or priority for improving air quality for the sake of people’s health.

Things won’t get better until officials adopt a new outlook. When will our political leaders take the lead and speak out, for the sake of our health?

Christine Loh Kung-wai is chief executive of the think-tank Civic Exchange

cloh@civic-exchange.org

Not Convinced By Government Claims Over Pollution Battle

Updated on Apr 29, 2008 – SCMP

Edwin Lau Che-feng, of Friends of the Earth, is right to publicly discount the government’s recent self-praise regarding its “cost” of environmental improvements in the transport sector for this city (“War on dirty vehicles has cost HK$10b in past eight years”, April 24).

We should not feel comforted by these figures. In fact, the government has done little for us in the past five years. What it has done, however, is subsidise the transport industry greatly, at a cost to all of us.

Without “sticks”, or penalties for making improvements, the government’s incentives for “voluntary” conversions of old diesel vehicles will hardly make a difference. To date, we still have more than 40 per cent of the local minibuses with old diesel engines, because the incentives and penalties are not enough to have them change. We still have more than 6,000 pre-Euro-II buses on our streets and only now is the government considering taking the extremely dirty ones out of the main urban areas. In fact, the government has given them another 10 years to operate on our roads with no mandates of improved emission technology. Out of the “cost” of HK$10 billion, a magical HK$8.8 billion of this is “forgone” revenue from diesel concessions. This is contrary to many countries which impose diesel taxes and use that revenue for the advancement of clean technologies and fuels. Clean diesel brings little benefit to the more than 70,000 pre-Euro-III diesel vehicles plying our streets, because their engines are not efficient enough to get the full impact of the clean diesel being introduced. We are being manipulated into thinking this is good for us. This “HK$8.8 billion” has not even been spent.

Had it been spent, it would amount to under HK$40 per person per year used for environmental improvements – hardly enough to change our air. Instead, each one of us is paying the “cost” of the government’s inactions and its subsidies to the transport industry that come with this government-supported pollution. This includes developed-world-beating asthma rates and constricted property prices. When will a hero from the government emerge to figure all of these issues out?

Douglas Woodring, Mid-Levels

Beijing Clearing Air Ahead of Olympics

Posted on Apr. 18, 2008 – Energy Tribune – By Lee Geng

In an effort to improve Beijing’s dismal air quality before the Olympic Games, authorities are closing factories and implementing stricter sulfur standards for motor fuel.

To curb Beijing’s pollution, the closure of some factories – particularly cement, coke, and small steel producers in northern China – has been ordered. Polluting factories believed to be partially responsible for the capital’s poor air quality have already been closed in the provinces and municipalities of Hebei, Inner Mongolia, Shandong, Shanxi, Tianjin, and Beijing. There are also plans to curb auto use and halt construction in Beijing before the Games begin.

As of March 1, Chinese refineries are required to produce gasoline and diesel that meet the Euro IV emission standards. The maximum sulfur content for both gasoline and diesel is capped at 50 parts per million, compared with the previous maximum for gasoline of 150 parts per million and diesel of 350 parts per million.

Sinopec’s and PetroChina’s refineries in the north have been upgraded to meet the new standard, with capacity to supply 505,000 tons per month, the bulk produced by Yanshan Petrochemical, one of Sinopec’s largest refineries. Beijing’s demand for oil products stands between 500,000 and 550,000 tons per month. The upgrades will be costly for the refiners, as the government is prohibiting them from raising prices to recover their investments.

However, that issue is taking a back seat to ongoing concerns about air pollution in Beijing. Last year, the smog there was so bad that Jacques Rogge, the International Olympic Committee’s president, said some of the events might have to be rescheduled. And Ethiopian runner Haile Gebrselassie, who holds the world record for the marathon, has already said he won’t compete in that event because he fears Beijing’s poor air quality will damage his health.

BASF Technology Provides Hong Kong With Cleaner Air

BASF is supplying diesel particulate filters for over 2,500 Hong Kong transit buses, marking the first large-scale commercial use of diesel particulate filters in the city as part of a diesel retrofit program. It also demonstrates BASF Catalysts’ continued efforts to promote a cleaner environment in Hong Kong with its more than 7 million inhabitants.
Beginning in spring 2008, BASF’s DPX™ Max filters will be installed on vehicles from Hong Kong’s four major transit bus operators – The Kowloon Motor Bus (1933) Co. Ltd. (KMB), Citybus Ltd. (CTB), New World First Bus Services Ltd. (NWST) and New Lantao Bus Co. (1973) Ltd. (NLB). BASF’s DPX technology has been proven on tens of thousands of trucks and buses, and earned the first U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Urban Bus Retrofit certificate.

Frank Ardite, Commercial Director, BASF Catalysts, said, “We have worked closely with the Environmental Protection Department and the transit bus operators since 2000 when the Hong Kong retrofit program began. We are excited to be chosen to bring the next level of diesel emissions control to Hong Kong.”

Kane Shum, Principal Engineer for KMB, and Paul Li, Head of Operations and Engineering for CTB and NWST, said that they conducted extensive field trials to find the right solution for Hong Kong before choosing BASF’s DPX Max filters, which can cut emissions of particulate matter, or soot, by more than 85%.

Diesel vehicles are the main cause of street-level air pollution in Hong Kong. As the number of vehicles and miles driven increase in Hong Kong’s urban areas, the city’s air quality problem has increased. The Hong Kong government has instituted a number of initiatives to combat the problem, including a diesel retrofit program aimed at reducing emissions from existing buses, trucks and vans.

In 2003, BASF Catalysts technology was selected for use in one of the world’s largest diesel engine retrofit programs. As a result, today over 35,000 Hong Kong buses and trucks feature BASF Catalysts’ diesel oxidation catalysts (DOCs), which significantly reduce carbon monoxide and hydrocarbon emissions.

Installation of the DPX Max filters is quick and easy. BASF Catalyst’s distributor in Hong Kong, Consolidated Parts and Accessories Sales Centre Ltd. (a member of Dah Chong Hong Holdings Ltd.), will supply the filters for the buses and provide maintenance services.

Posted April 2nd, 2008 – Azom.com

Tax Break For Vehicles

April 1st, 2008 – SCMP

Buyers of newly registered commercial vehicles that meet the standard for environmentally friendly commercial vehicles, set at the Euro V level, will from today enjoy concessions of up to 100 per cent on their first registration taxes, the Environmental Protection Department said.