Clear The Air News Blog Rotating Header Image

December, 2011:

ClientEarth takes Government to court over air pollution levels

http://www.thelawyer.com/clientearth-takes-government-to-court-over-air-pollution-levels/1010647.article

Dec. 13, 2011

13 December 2011 | By Joanne Harris

Environmental lawyers ClientEarth are taking the Government to court today for not tackling high levels of air pollution in the UK.

Mr Justice Mitting will this morning (13 December) hear ClientEarth’s challenge against the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Caroline Spelman, saying that the Government should have complied with EU limits for air quality by 1 January 2010.

6 Pump Court’s Stephen Hockman QC, who is a trustee of ClientEarth, will argue the case.

The organisation says 17 regions and cities, including London, Manchester, Birmingham, Glasgow and Cardiff, will not meet the limits until after 2015.

ClientEarth is asking the court to order the Secretary of State to draw up plans that will achieve legal compliance throughout the UK by 2015. It also wants Mitting J to make a declaration that the Secretary of State is in breach of her legal obligations.

James Thornton, CEO of ClientEarth said the Government’s strategies for tackling air pollution were “frankly pathetic”.

Thornton added: “Instead of delaying action in the hope they can persuade the EU to weaken the legal limits the Government needs to tackle this public health crisis now.”

Success for Australian trial of carbon capture and storage

http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2011/s3389540.htm

TONY EASTLEY: Carbon capture and storage, considered by many to be the poor cousin of the climate change response, enjoyed a breakthrough in the recent Durban Climate Conference.

The technology to strip carbon dioxide from power generation and industrial processes has been approved as a clean development mechanism.

It was often criticised as too risky, too expensive and too far off.

However, the scientists behind an Australian trial of carbon storage say they can now prove that it works and it’s safe.

As Simon Lauder reports, critics of the scheme aren’t convinced.

SIMON LAUDER: In March 2008, scientists began injecting carbon dioxide deep underground near Warrnambool in south-western Victoria. Now the results of that experiment are in.

CHARLES JENKINS: This project went extremely well, the results are pretty convincing and I think we could go ahead with this right now.

SIMON LAUDER: CSIRO (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation) research scientist Dr Charles Jenkins is the lead author of a paper published today in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

It shows what happened when scientists pumped 65,000 tonnes of CO2-rich gas 2 kilometres underground into a depleted natural gas reservoir.

Dr Jenkins says the project proves storingCO2 in depleted gas fields is effective. And there’s now enough evidence to proceed with large scale geological storage of CO2 in gas fields the world over.

He says the potential is huge.

CHARLES JENKINS: There’s a lot of these depleted gas fields that are ideally placed for that. The estimates are that after 2050 you could probably get rid of about two-thirds of the carbon dioxide that’s being produced by these big sources.

So globally it’s a very, very significant resource for us.

SIMON LAUDER: One of the main concerns raised about storing CO2 underground is that it may just leak back out again.

Dr Jenkins says that didn’t seem to happen.

CHARLES JENKINS: We have a very sustained an intensive program of monitoring the groundwater, the soil and the atmosphere. We could see absolutely no sign of our activities frankly.

SIMON LAUDER: Can your findings be readily applied to other sites or are they very site specific?

CHARLES JENKINS: Well, it’s a question of whether you think the bottle is half empty or half full really. I mean it’s one measurement. Before we had this measurement we didn’t have any measurements.

SIMON LAUDER: Critics of carbon capture and storage say it’s still unproven on any large scale.

Emeritus Professor of Chemical Engineering at the University of Canterbury in New Zealand, Arthur Williamson.

ARTHUR WILLIAMSON: They have managed to make it work for a short time, on a small scale, in a particular gas field.

SIMON LAUDER: The project has been run by the Cooperative Research Centre for Greenhouse Gas Technologies with the backing of the Australian Government and the efforts of scientists from around the world.

TONY EASTLEY: Simon Lauder.

New system to make ban on idle engines a breeze

Hong Kong Standard

With the ban on idling engines just a day away, the territory has unveiled its first automatic system to keep cool drivers who have stopped.

Tuesday, December 13, 2011

With the ban on idling engines just a day away, the territory has unveiled its first automatic system to keep cool drivers who have stopped.

Developed by the Hong Kong Productivity Council, the system aims to ease the problem of high in-vehicle temperatures during idle stops while improving roadside air quality by cutting emissions.

“With this system, when a vehicle comes to a complete stop, the engine will stop automatically, cutting emissions caused by idling,” council chairman Clement Chen Cheng-jen said.

“Also, once the engine stops, the auxiliary air-conditioning system will kick in immediately and can keep running for up to an hour.”

The system, funded by the government Environment and Conservation Fund and the Woo Wheelock Green Fund, is currently undergoing patent registration and can cut fuel consumption, Chen said.

“We plan to commercialize the technology through licensing to auto parts manufacturers for sales and production, creating business opportunities for the industry.”

The council is also upgrading the system to extend air-conditioning supply to up to two hours, a feat that will be tested early next year.

Under the ban taking effect on Thursday, drivers cannot leave their engines idling for more than three minutes in any 60-minute period, subject to a fixed penalty of HK$320.

Taxis at stands are exempt, as are the first two minibuses at stands. All drivers are exempt during very hot weather or rainstorm warnings. STAFF REPORTER

Who’s paying the piper?

South China Morning Post

Speaking on RTHK’s Backchat programme yesterday, Jim Middleton, chairman of anti-pollution group Clear The Air, mentioned that it would be interesting to know the funding for the various interests in Legco that succeeded in delaying then watering down the idling engine legislation.

He makes a good point. Do the bus companies fund political parties? Is this why legislative action to reduce vehicle emissions is so painfully slow?

Most developed economies have laws forcing political parties to divulge the source of their funding. It would be interesting, for example, to know where the DAB gets HK$70 million that enables it to provide free rice to older voters in housing estates, bus them to the polling booths and so on. But since those pulling the party strings are unlikely to want this, it’s unlikely to happen.

Developers show extent of influence

South China Morning Post – Dec. 13, 2011

More than 70 seats on the Election Committee were won by candidates holding key positions in the city’s dominant businesses, mainly property, a result critics said illustrated the extent of the sector’s influence over the chief executive election.

But while the hand of business in politics was too significant to ignore, it did not amount to a monopoly, one political analyst said.

Business figures won 73 seats – with 49 contested and 24 uncontested. The seats were spread across the commercial, tourism, transport, hotel and engineering subsectors.

Research by The Professional Commons, a pan democrat think tank, released ahead of Sunday’s election showed 85 candidates held senior positions – such as executive directorships – in major enterprises and subsidiaries.

Sun Hung Kai Properties (SEHK: 0016) was at the top of the list, winning 12 seats after fielding 15 candidates. All nine candidates from The Wharf (Holdings) (SEHK: 0004) won, while Henderson Land Development (SEHK: 0012), Great Eagle (SEHK: 0041), Cheung Kong-Hutchison (SEHK: 0013), Jardines and Swire won five to six seats.

Albert Lai Kwong-tak, convenor of the think tank’s research committee, said the results showed developers had extended their influence beyond the original design of the electoral system.

“Developers were supposed to represent the interests of their own subsectors, but subsidiaries also won seats in other subsectors, which has strengthened their influence in deciding the next chief executive,” he said.

Ivan Choy Chi-keung, a political analyst at Chinese University, said the sector’s influence was too obvious to ignore.

“Of course it has a significant impact [on the election], but it’s not as big as a monopoly,” Choy said. Other subsectors, like agriculture and fisheries, were seen by Beijing as much more secure bastions of votes.

Three supporters of sustainable development who ran as independents failed in their effort to break the Hong Kong General Chamber of Commerce’s dominance in the commercial (first) subsector.

The chamber’s 18 candidates for the 18 seats were returned with vote tallies ranging from 183 to 338.

Markus Shaw, president of WWF Hong Kong, won 166; Dr George Cautherley, a vice-chairman of the Hong Kong Democratic Foundation, secured 126; and Stephen Wong Yuen-shan, a former investment banker, 147.

“We were obviously disappointed,” Wong said. “But given the chamber’s iron-clad votes, a significant voice was heard echoing to show where we stand and the message we send.”

Cheung Kong (Holdings) (SEHK: 0001) and Sun Hung Kai got more than 130 votes – out of 860 in the commercial (first) subsector – through their subsidiaries. Election Affairs Commission Justice Barnabas Fung Wah said last week the subsidiaries had registered in accordance with the rules.

Death-by-Air in Beijing Shows China’s Heart Risk From Worsening Pollution

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-12-15/death-by-air-in-beijing-shows-china-s-heart-risk-from-worsening-pollution.html

Death-by-Air in Beijing Exposes Pollution’s Untold Heart

Mark Ralston/AFP/Getty Images

Cars travel on the second ring road as pollution reaches what the US Embassy monitoring station says are ‘Hazardous’ levels in Beijing on December 5, 2011.

Cars travel on the second ring road as pollution reaches what the US Embassy monitoring station says are ‘Hazardous’ levels in Beijing on December 5, 2011. Photographer: Mark Ralston/AFP/Getty Images

Citizens Offer Clarity on Beijing's Air Quality

Dec. 12 (Bloomberg) — Bloomberg’s Paul Allen reports on Beijing’s air pollution levels. Poor air quality in Beijing, and the way it’s reported by government authorities, is prompting some of the city’s residents to take measurements into their own hands and post the results online. (Source: Bloomberg)

As smog grounded hundreds of flights from Beijing last week, emergency doctors at Peking UniversityPeople’s Hospital faced a rush of patients.

Lungs weren’t the problem, says Ding Rongjing, the hospital’s deputy head of cardiology. Five people were admitted for heart attacks from Dec. 4 to 6, compared with one or two a week typically. One 60-year-old male patient died.

The illnesses are an unwanted consequence of the economic growth that helped spur a 32 percent jump in China’s car sales last year. Outdoor air pollution kills 1.3 million people globally each year, the World Health Organization estimates. A growing body of evidence shows dirty air not only triggers asthma and other respiratory conditions, over time it may the damage heart and blood vessels, and even cause birth defects.

“Whenever we have days with bad pollution, we get significantly more patients with symptoms like high blood pressure, feeling of suffocation, and chest pains,” Ding said in an interview at the hospital, where she’s worked since 1996. On days of extreme pollution, heart and stroke cases at the 1,450-bed center can increase as much as 40 percent to 280 patients, she said.

Before hosting the 2008 Olympics, Beijing imposed driving limits, suspended work at construction sites and moved factories out of the city to clean up the capital’s air. Economic growth, averaging 10 percent a year, and a population of 19.6 millionpeople expanding at a 3.8 percent clip is making air-quality improvements harder to sustain.

Starve the Heart

Microscopic air particles 30 times smaller than the width of a human hair penetrate deep in the lungs, where they can pass into the bloodstream, said Jon Ayres, professor of environmental and respiratory medicine at the University of Birmingham, in a telephone interview. The contaminants increase the risk of artery-blocking clots that can starve the heart, brain and other organs of oxygen, according to Ayres.

“In somebody with coronary artery disease where the arteries are narrower anyway, having blood that is more likely to clot is a bad thing,” said Ayres, who chairs a U.K. panel on the medical effects of air pollutants.

The danger is increased when the inhaled substances cause the coronary arteries to become inflamed, he said. Cardiovascular disease is the biggest killer in China, accounting for 38 percent of deaths, the WHO says.

Traffic Jams

Constant traffic jams and resultant idling engines emit lung-penetrating toxic material, said Pan Xiaochuan, a professor of environmental health at Peking University who studies the impact of air pollution.

The U.S. embassy in Beijing monitors pollutants smaller than 2.5 micrometers in diameter, known as PM2.5, and releases the information via Twitter.

“What is needed is better traffic management,” Pan said.“People still drive even if the traffic is bad, and it’s hard to convince them to take public transport after they spent so much money to buy their own cars.”

There were 4.81 million vehicles on Beijing roads last year, triple the number in 2000, government data show. Car ownership in China is offsetting the benefits of the past decade’s efforts to limit industrial emissions, said Xu Dongqun, deputy director of the Institute for Environmental Health and Related Product Safety at the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention.

Murky Haze

“The level of fine particulate matter is still increasing because it comes not just from industrial emission and coal-burning, but also from the large amount of cars on the roads,”Xu said on Dec. 5 from a second-floor meeting room in central Beijing, where murky haze outside rendered the housing blocks across the street barely visible. “This is why we see the level of PM2.5 worsening in cities.”

Emissions data on PM2.5 are slated to be made publicly available throughout China’s cities, including Beijing, by 2016. The timeframe is too slow, according to a Dec. 8 editorial in the state-owned China Daily newspaper, which called on the government to be “brave enough” to measure the tiny contaminants.

The government currently uses an indicator known as PM10 that measures particulate as big as 10 micrometers in diameter for its public pollution data.

Air quality in all of the 32 Chinese cities that track pollution fall short of WHO guidelines. The air in Beijing is the fifth-worst in China, based on the PM10 measure. Annual levels average 121 micrograms per cubic meter of air, compared with a global average of 71 micrograms and the 20 micrograms recommended by the Geneva-based agency.

Deadly Air

Each 10-microgram increase above WHO guidelines for PM2.5 boosts emergency room visits for cardiovascular ailments by as much as 7 percent, a 2009 study by the Peking University School of Public Health found.

Breathing dirty air does have an impact on mortality, researchers found in a 12-year study in June involving 12,584 residents of the northeastern city of Shenyang. After adjusting for smoking and other known risk factors, the authors found levels of PM10 and the air pollutant nitrogen oxide “were significantly associated” with death from cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, they said.

Information on air quality in Beijing is provided by multiple sources, including the U.S. embassy, and daily measurements are often inconsistent. That makes it harder for residents to know how and when they should take extra precautions, says cardiologist Ding.

Smog Deterrent

The Chinese CDC would like to see coordinated warning data broadcast on the nightly news, the center’s Xu said. Publicizing the data may have implications for businesses if it means more people are worried about air quality and are reluctant to live in the city.

“That’s one of the major factors that has an impact on standard of living in Beijing,” said Lee Quane, the Hong Kong-based regional director for Asia at ECA International. Executives relocating from abroad will typically opt for Hong Kong over Beijing if they have choice, he said.

The human resources advisory firm recommends employers pay Beijing staff a higher hardship allowance than those in Chinese citiessuch as Shanghai, Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Quane said.

“Beijing has historically had the worst air pollution out of the 20 mainland Chinese cities that we look at,” he said.“Many of these senior executives are married and have children, who are much more affected by air pollution, so they need greater financial incentives to come.”

ECA recommends companies offer an extra 15-to-25 percent of base salary to top-level executives relocating to Beijing, compared with 10-20 percent for Shanghai.

“We definitely worry about young kids and elderly people with lung and heart diseases,” said Richard Saint Cyr, a doctor at theBeijing United Family Hospital. “Most people think it’s just lungs. But if you’re already on the edge with heart disease, and you’re out playing golf when the air pollution is really bad, it is a very high risk for having a heart attack.”

To contact Bloomberg News staff for this story: Daryl Loo in Beijing at dloo7@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Jason Gale at j.gale@bloomberg.net

Air Pollution Increases Risk of Cervical, Brain, and Lung Cancers

http://www.empowher.com/print/10457656

By Linda Fugate PhD

Created 12/12/2011 – 07:07

Urban air pollution from automobile traffic contains low levels of carcinogens in the form of ultrafine particles. Since large population numbers are exposed to this type of pollution, even a small increase in cancer risk can produce a significant number of cancer cases.

Ole Raaschou-Nielsen and colleagues in Denmark performed a study of 54,304 people exposed to different levels of air pollution over the time period 1971 to 2006.

“The airways are the primary target organs, but accumulating evidence from experiments in animals shows that ultrafine particles can translocate to other organs,” Raaschou-Nielsen explained. The research team collected records of 21 types of cancer over a period of 10 years. People who lived in areas with the highest air pollution numbers had elevated rates of cervical, brain, and lung cancers.

The participants were enrolled in the Danish Diet, Cancer, and Health cohort study. Air pollution was quantified by the concentrations of NO(x) molecules calculated from the Danish AirGIS modeling system. The researchers performed separate studies for lung cancer and for cancers of all other sites.

Lung cancer rates were 30 percent higher in participants who lived in the highest air pollution areas, compared with the lowest pollution areas. “The results indicated stronger associations among nonsmokers, among participant[s] with longer school attendance, and among those with relatively low dietary intake of fruit”, Raaschou-Nielsen reported.

Inhaled carcinogens can reach any part of the body through the bloodstream. In addition, Raaschou-Nielsen reported that ultrafine particles can reach the brain through the olfactory nerves that serve the nose. An inflammatory response may be one step in the development of brain cancer, which showed significantly increased rates in people exposed to the highest levels of air pollution.

The association between high automobile traffic and increased rates of cervical cancer was not explained by any known mechanism. Raaschou-Nielsen pointed out that the researchers had no information on rates of humanpapillomavirus (HPV) infection, which is recognized as a cause of cervical cancer.

“It is possible that HPV infection is more prevalent among women living in areas with heavy traffic and air pollution,” he noted. Further research is needed to determine whether it was the air pollution itself or some related factor that caused higher rates of cervical cancer.

References:

1. Raaschou-Nielson O et al, “Air pollution from traffic and cancer incidence: a Danish cohort study”, Environmental Health 2011; 10: 67. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21771295

2. Raaschou-Nielson O et al, “Lung cancer incidence and long-term exposure to air pollution from traffic”, Environ Health Prespect 2011; 199: 860-865.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21227886

3. National Environmental Research Institute. AirGIS. Web. Dec. 6, 2011.
http://www.dmu.dk/en/air/models/airgis

Reviewed December 12, 2011
by Michele Blacksberg RN
Edited by Jody Smith

Copyright © 2011 HW, LLC d/b/a EmpowHER Media unless otherwise noted. EmpowHER does not provide medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment.


Source URL (retrieved on 12/13/2011 – 07:57): http://www.empowher.com/cancer/content/air-pollution-increases-risk-cervical-brain-and-lung-cancers

CTA was onair today

http://programme.rthk.org.hk/channel/radio/programme.php?name=radio3/backchat&d=2011-12-12&p=514&e=&m=episode

Vehicle engine-idling law /

On today’s Backchat, we look at the implementation of vehicle engine-idling laws that come into effect on Thursday

Bad air truly a matter of life and death

SCMP Letters 10 Dec 2011

In the two years since the government finished the review of its air quality objectives, nothing has been done about it.

The government doesn’t seem to realise the health threats of Hong Kong’s poor air quality.

While doctors cannot say on a death certificate that a person was “killed by air pollutants”, it is well known among health professionals that air pollution is highly associated with fatal diseases.

Studies have shown that people in polluted areas develop respiratory symptoms more readily and people who are exposed to air pollutants for a long time die sooner than those who are not.

So how bad is the air in Hong Kong? It is not unusual for members of the public to think that air quality is of minimal significance and to consider that our present levels are normal and acceptable.

This is not true.

The air quality objectives have not been updated since 1987, and yet it is this standard that the government uses to assess the extent of air pollution, monitor projects and approve new ones.

The outdated standards are extremely lax compared with the World Health Organisation’s air quality guidelines.

Do we not deserve better air to breathe? It is time for the government to face the challenge. No more vague emission control proposals, no more uncertain time frames, no more excuses for negligence.

We can all make a difference by expressing our concerns and urging the government to take action promptly. We all deserve a breath of fresh air.

Wincy Ng Wing-sze, Pok Fu Lam

Idling ban up, running but going nowhere fast

South China Morning Post – Dec. 10, 2011

For first month of new law, wardens and environment officers will take softly-softly approach and issue warnings rather than hand out tickets

Law enforcement officers will adopt a lenient approach in the first month of the ban on idling engines, with verbal warnings given first before offenders are handed any HK$320 fixed-penalty tickets, environment officials said yesterday.

Up to 280 traffic wardens in uniform and 400 inspectors from the Environmental Protection Department will have the additional duty of enforcing the ban when it comes into force next Thursday.

Idling hot spots, including Causeway Bay and school areas, may be specifically targeted, while private car parks are a lower priority because enforcement will require prior consent from the property owners.

The public can file complaints to the department on suspected breaches.

The government drew up a draft ban in 2007, some six years after it was first proposed. But after negotiations with the transport industry, the resulting legislation passed in March represented a much toned-down version, with a series of exemptions.

The original ban covered all vehicles and roads all-year. It offered no grace period, no exemptions in extreme weather and excluded only the first two taxis waiting at a rank.

Now, all taxis at a taxi stand are exempt, as are the first two minibuses at stands. Drivers will also be allowed to idle their engines on days when the Observatory issues hot weather and rainstorm warnings.

Breaching the ban will attract a fixed penalty of HK$320. However, in the first month of the ban, an offender will initially be verbally warned. A ticket will be issued only if the offender ignores the warning.

From the second month, officers will be less tolerant. Drivers who dispute the enforcement can seek a court review.

Officials hope the ban will make drivers change their behaviour as they realise the benefits to be made from saving fuel.

Mok Wai-chuen, assistant director of environmental protection, said officers would first identify if a vehicle is idling by listening to the sounds, checking the engine vibration and looking at the parking meters. They will also make sure the vehicles is not subject to exemptions before they start counting the three minutes.

“Officers will not hide themselves from the drivers and vehicles and count the time as they have to complete the pre-counting checks,” he said, adding the officers will carefully record the location and time, as well as the information of the vehicles and drivers.

It is expected that most drivers will turn off their engines when they see the officers.

Drivers are also reminded that they are only given an aggregate of three minutes exemption in any one-hour period, even if they drive their vehicles to a different location within this period. Beyond the three minutes, drivers will be prosecuted.

If a driver continues to idle their vehicle, officers have the power to issue more penalty tickets.

Mok said a driver could not evade the engine-idling ban by switching cars or seats with someone as officers should have little problem recognising the driver and vehicle in question.

“If we find a car idling without a driver, we will wait until the driver comes back. If he or she doesn’t, police assistance will be sought,” he said.

Hung Cheung-yau, chairman of Hong Kong Traffic Wardens’ Union, said it was hard to tell if the ban would lead to more disputes with drivers.

“It is like issuing illegal parking tickets. Some disputes are inevitable. But we are used to it,” he said.

Hung said traffic wardens only assumed a complementary role in enforcing the ban. “We will deliver our primary duties like traffic control before we have time for the ban.”

DOS AND DON’Ts FOR IDLERS

Scope of the idling engine ban

It covers all vehicles, except electric or hybrid vehicles in electric mode; all year round on all roads, including private roads and car parks

Drivers will be exempted under the following conditions

1. Any idling for no more than three minutes in a continuous 60-minute period

2. All day when the very hot weather warning, or amber, red or black rainstorm warnings are issued

3. Idling due to traffic congestion, like queuing at a petrol station or car park, or an accident

4. Idling due to mechanical problems

5. Boarding or alighting of a passenger

Other exemptions

1. Taxis at taxi stand

2. First two red or green minibuses at bus stand

3. Any red minibus with any passenger on board, and the minibus immediately behind it

4. Private school light bus or coach with any passenger on board

5. Franchise bus with any passenger on board or ready for boarding

6. Vehicles of 12 medical, emergency or law enforcement bodies

7. Vehicles carrying live animals for public health protection or other operational activities

8. Security vehicles operated by licensed parties

9. PLA Garrison vehicles on operations or training

10. Any vehicle requiring idling to perform a purpose it is designed for (eg operating the tail board of a truck, or refuse collection vehicles)

Who will enforce the ban

Traffic wardens and inspectors from the Environmental Protection Department

Penalty

Fixed fine of HK$320 (more than one ticket can be issued if driver refuses to switch off engine for subsequent three-minute periods)

chifai.cheung@scmp.com