Clear The Air News Blog Rotating Header Image

Incineration – Solid Waste Disposal

Health and terrorism fears over new Gloucestershire incinerator

http://www.thisisgloucestershire.co.uk/Health-terrorism-fears-new-Gloucestershire/story-16846793-detail/story.htm

AN incinerator would reduce residents’ life expectancies by 11 years and put the area at risk of a terrorist attack, experts claim.

Plans to build a £500million waste burner at Javelin Park near Haresfield could impact the health of people living within a 15-mile radius, engulfing both Gloucester and Cheltenham, Dr Dick Van Steenis said on Wednesday night.

Description: WARNING:  Dr Dick Van Steenis, middle, with Ian Butler (Hardwicke Parish Council chairman) and Anna Mozul (Quedgeley Parish Council chairman).

WARNING: Dr Dick Van Steenis, middle, with Ian Butler (Hardwicke Parish Council chairman) and Anna Mozul (Quedgeley Parish Council chairman).

The retired GP said his research into areas downwind of incinerators show an increase in baby defects, deaths among babies and deaths from heart attacks and cancer.

Within five years, there would be 1,200 extra deaths and residents would have to foot a £280million NHS bill, according to Dr Van Steenis, who has lectured worldwide about the issue.

Dr Van Steenis said: “It is now up to the people to rise up and say enough is enough. We don’t want any extra deaths. These incinerators are junk and they kill.

“We will start to see babies being born with defects. People should be worried about this. They will come first, and then heart attacks and cancers will follow within a few years.”

Dr Van Steenis recommends the use of plasma units, which he says are a cleaner and cheaper alternative.

He was talking to residents at Hardwicke Village Hall after parish councillors from Quedgeley and Hardwicke joined forces to protest against the plans.

Security risk expert Malcolm Cheshire, a Quedgeley resident of 27 years, warned at the meeting that the incinerator could also make the city a terrorist threat. He said: “Biological, chemical and radiological weapons could be created from certain chemicals and gases that are secreted from the site.”

Gloucestershire County Council’s Cabinet is likely to give a 25-year contract to Urbaser Balfour Beatty on Wednesday.

Councillor Stan Waddington, champion for waste, said: “This deal is good value for Gloucestershire and will help us deliver a green and affordable solution to our rubbish.”

The council hopes to save £190million over 25 years.

A UBB spokesperson said: “Dr Van Steenis has raised his concerns at a number of public inquiries in the country where his evidence on health effects and alternative technologies has been considered but not accepted.”

“All thermal treatment facilities must comply with the same stringent emissions limits.

“Energy from waste is a tried and tested technology and there are currently more than 350 operating throughout Europe.

“Had we have been invited to Dr Van Steenis’ presentation we would have been able to provide the alternative perspective, which is based on credible evidence rather than scare-mongering.

“The Health Protection Agency’s position is that well run and regulated modern Municipal Waste Incinerators are not a significant risk to public health. All thermal treatment facilities, including energy from waste and gasification plants, must comply with the same stringent emissions limits. Energy from waste is a tried and tested technology and there are currently more than 350 operating throughout Europe.”

They said security measures were already planned.

Incinerator – A tour of Shek Kwu Chau

The China Daily video supplement was a bit delayed, but is now uploaded to the site and youtube now. Here’s a link: http://bit.ly/O08B2U – with Martin and Patrick from SARDA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8TvcYfBkT-k&feature=player_embedded

-Doug

China Daily story today

From: Doug Meigs [mailto:dougmeigs@gmail.com]
Sent: 31 August, 2012 12:03
To: Martin Williams
Cc: Rosa Ma; James Middleton; David Wu; Basil Hui; Tom Hope
Subject: Re: China Daily story today – thanks for your help!

Hello,

The China Daily video supplement was a bit delayed, but is now uploaded to the site and youtube now. Here’s a link: http://bit.ly/O08B2U – with Martin and Patrick from SARDA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8TvcYfBkT-k&feature=player_embedded

Thanks again!

-Doug

On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Martin Williams <martin@drmartinwilliams.com> wrote:

Hi Doug:

Many thanks for this info; much appreciated.

I’ve always figured Cheung Chau as being pretty much out of the loop as far as the Heung Yee Kuk goes; thinking of northwest and north New Territories as prime HKY areas [more associated with rice farming, I’d thought – maybe wrongly]

Still, very interesting to learn of this.

Bit like the Masons in Britain [especially], or something!?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freemasonry

– likewise, with some secrecy and involvement of business folk, all too easy to come up with conspiracy theories…

And yes, seems things had been going along as if the EPD incinerator itinerary would be followed nicely: trips to see incinerators, happy island “leaders” and so forth, along with professors [whose views may be influenced by their grants… ….]

Indeed true that EPD seems to have aimed for another incinerator; first get one at SKC with little opposition, say “Hey, this is fabulous”, and then try n railroad next one through at Tuen Mun, before then wondering where to put the next one [given so little effort into recycling etc]

Whether can get a genuine reconsideration, who knows; but as you’ve seen, I’ve circulated your article to a few people, hope it can help slow momentum {now behind the scenes] towards the SKC monster!’

All the best,

Martin

Dr Martin Williams. Writing. Photography. Multimedia.
Recognised as an Outstanding Earth Champion by the Earth Champions Foundation
Cheung Chau, Hong Kong; tel 96201824

DocMartin – Passion for the Wild, PR for the Planet
Hong Kong Outdoors – Wild About Hong Kong
Cheung Chau HK – South China Sea Island in Hong Kong

On 24 Aug 2012, at 3:38 PM, Doug Meigs wrote:

Hello, here’s my story from today, about how and why Shek Kwu Chau’s resident rehab facility opposes the incinerator plan: http://bit.ly/PLa5fw

Thanks for all your help with this story. Unfortunately, I wasn’t able to weave the trip-funding debacle into this feature because of deadline concerns and word-count. I will pay close attention to the issue.

Here’s some more info on the HKIDA – it was established in 1996 to ensure a stable handover to China, take an involvement in Islands District political, cultural and national issues… the HKIDA chairman Mr. Leung told me that rural committee chairmen of the islands district – i.e. Heung Yee Kuk folks – pay a “donation” in order to receive honorary board positions. That’s why there are so many Heung Yee Kuk folks in charge (Daniel Lam was the chairman off-and-on over the years). Last year they took a “study trip” to Zhuhai in relation to the Zhuhai-HK-Macau bridge. And last week they co-organized the Silvermine Beach festival. Mr. Leung said that Randy Yu just had to help out at the meeting Rosa observed as part of his duties with the organization. The goals/board of the HKIDA sound like a Heung Yee Kuk committee, but Leung said they are not affiliated despite the large number of members. They sound like an uber-nationalistic group, and I expect they are reluctant to take advise from a bunch of green foreign barbarians

It seems that either the HKIDA is part of a huge conspiracy for infrastructure jobs and/or to avoid putting the incinerator near the domain of Lau Wong Fat, Randy’s father-in-law… OR…  these HKIDA folks are simply uninformed about the alternatives. After all, Prof. Johnathan Wong has no faith in plasma arch technology, and he’s a key govt. advisor based on all his funding received.

My guess is that it’s a bit of both, along with a suspicion that it was Edward Yau and the EPD’s plan all along was to build in Shek Kwu Chau AND the Tsang Tsui spot.

If you find any more info to help substantiate the HKIDA and incinerator collusion, please share it with me.

Thanks again!

-Doug

6195 2777

Villagers to Battle Waste Plant

http://www.rfa.org/english/news/china/battle-08212012163821.html

Description: http://www.rfa.org/english/news/china/protest-04052011153707.html/china-incinerator-305.gif

Imaginechina

A Chinese worker looks into a garbage incinerator plant in Qionghai, south China’s Hainan province, Dec. 1, 2009.

Residents of an industrial town in the southern Chinese province of Guangdong are banding together in protest over plans to build a waste incinerator on their doorstep, local sources said on Tuesday.

More than 1,000 local people turned out for a town meeting late on Monday, amid rising anger and concerns over the health effects of pollution from the planned Humen plant, according to a local village committee member surnamed Zhou.

“There were about 1,000 people there, including bosses from nearby factories and local people,” Zhou said in an interview on Tuesday. “All of them were against the planned incinerator, which would have a huge impact on Xinwei [village],” he said.

Zhou said the township government had tried to keep the news under wraps following a campaign on the part of local residents, who wrote more than 10,000 complaint letters about the plans in recent months.

“Now it has come out that they are planning to start work at the location they originally planned for, following an environmental impact assessment,” he said.

The government wants to build the Humen Waste Disposal Plant at Dalingshan, just 650 meters from Xinwei and Dapaizhai villages, just 3.8 kilometers from the Henggang reservoir, which supplies Houjietownship with drinking water.

The hillside and lakeside location is already home to a number of smart apartment complexes, whose 50,000 residents thought they were buying into one of the last green oases in the Dongguan area, local sources said.

Threat to water?

A Henggang village resident surnamed Lai said she was concerned that pollution from the plant might poison the local supply of drinking water, on which around 100,000 people depend.

She said the high-level location of the plant and the prevailing wind direction would mean that the countryside downwind would be covered in toxic smoke from the incineration process.

“People here don’t believe that this won’t cause a problem,” Lai said. “They are afraid that all these toxic gases will be expelled and that they will start to get sick within the next five years.”

“That would be genuinely scary,” she said.

A resident of the Haiyi Haoting apartment complex surnamed Huo said the way the government had tried to railroad local people into accepting the project was unacceptable.

“I am definitely against this,” she said. “Our home is very near there, probably about five kilometers away.”

“There are residential districts in all four directions around the planned incineration plant, and residential areas right next to it, too.”

“A lot of people have already voiced their opposition to the incinerator and protested when it was first announced,” Huo said. “At the very least they should solicit opinions from local people.”

Growing activism

An official who answered the phone at the Dongguan municipal environmental protection department, which oversees Henggang township, said she hadn’t heard that the government was planning to proceed with the plant.

“I don’t know about that,” she said, but declined to comment further.

The preparatory committee for the plant announced plans for the 4.1 billion yuan (U.S.$645 million) incinerator last year, which is projected to burn 1,000 tons of rubbish daily.

Three decades of breakneck economic growth have left Guangdong with a seriously degraded environment, sparking a nascent environmental movement from the city’s new middle class.

Previous attempts to build similar plants elsewhere in the province have drawn widespread criticism over local government access to the huge potential profits linked to waste disposal projects.

In 2009, during a similar protest in Panyu, local residents said that incinerators could earn 140 yuan (U.S. $20) per ton in government subsidies for every ton of trash burned, which could amount to 480,000 yuan(U.S. $70,000) per day, or 173 million yuan (U.S. $25 million) each year.

Local residents fear the plants will endanger their health and the environment, while officials say Guangdong has to find some way to dispose of mountains of garbage.

Ordinary Chinese people are becoming increasingly active in support of environmental issues in recent years, putting pressure on governments to implement the country’s comprehensive environmental protection laws.

Activists say, however, that environmental officials lack the power to impose the legislation on powerful vested interests at the local level.

Last month, authorities in the southwestern province of Sichuan promised to permanently scrap a high-profile copper-processing plant after two days of violent protests from local residents.

Reported by Lin Jing for RFA’s Cantonese service. Translated and written in English by Luisetta Mudie.

Copyright © 1998-2011 Radio Free Asia. All rights reserved.

Call for comments on KfW’s reply to Chinese NGOs on Nangong Incinerator, Beijing

From: GAIA
Sent: 30 August, 2012 11:10
To: GAIA Members; GAIA European Network
Subject: [GAIA] Call for comments on KfW’s reply to Chinese NGOs on Nangong Incinerator, Beijing

Dear GAIAns,

The German KfW banking group sent Chinese NGOs a reply letter on Monday (27 August) as below, which we think is very burearatic and lack of substantial response to the problems that we raised. And bearing in mind, this is their first reply since we firstly sent them open letter on August 8.

But they said they are willing to talk with us, and we have already set up a meeting with their Beijing representatives on Tuesday morning.

Please give us your comments on KfW’s reply, and help to give pressure to KfW to directly respond to our 7 recommendations in our open letter (in English and with photos of previous KfW invested projects in troublehttp://www.lingfeiqi.cn/plus/view.php?aid=871).

KfW’s reply:

Financial Cooperation with the PR China
Nangong Waste Incineration Plant
Reply to your Open Letter dated August 8th, 2012

Dear Sirs,

We thank you for the above mentioned letter expressing your concerns regarding the Nangong Waste Incineration Project in Beijing. We appreciate the seriousness of concerns and the competent content of the letter. We would like to invite you to have a meeting with our office in Beijing for a further discussion. However, please find some comments to the letter in the following.

Currently the planning for the Nangong Waste Incineration Plant is ongoing. The project has not yet been tendered. It is our intention and in line with the mission of our institution as a financing partner to ensure the construction of a plant that conforms with the best Chinese and European standards. As you are aware in Germany the huge majority of waste is incinerated, also in densely populated areas. Close to our headquarters in the city of Frankfurt such a plant is located. There is a proven technology available to reduce to environmental impacts to an acceptable minimum. We share the view with the Chinese project partners to realize such a solution in order to demonstrate in China how such plants can be designed and operated properly and without inacceptable environmental consequences.

With our bank we have significant technical and managerial expertise available to make sure that only a solution will be realized that is in line with this approach.

As a financing partner we request the right to confirm all significant steps before and during implementing of such a project. Numerous safeguards will be imposed. We also follow up the operation of any project financed for approximately three years.

Secondly you refer to the existing composting plant also in Nangong and describe some operational problems. The compost plant is one component of a large waste disposal project which you describe in your letter as overall successful. The facilities are already in operation for more than ten years. We thank you for the information and will follow up.

As mentioned in your letter KfW is guided by high social and ecological principles. We seriously apply such principals in Germany, Europe and also with projects financed in Developing Countries. These principals in Germany, Europe and also guide all our decisions regarding our participation as a financing partner for the Waste Incineration Plant in Nangong.

With kind regards,

KfW

Dr. Christine Heimburger
Director

Michael Sumser
Senior Project Manager

Download PDF : Reply open letter 27 Aug 2012

INCINERATOR LATEST – Campaigners’ delight as ministers call in Saddlebow incinerator proposal

Whereas in Hong Kong the official charged with protecting the Environment is also the EIA rubber stamp for destroying it !

http://www.lynnnews.co.uk/news/latest-news/incinerator-latest-campaigners-delight-as-ministers-call-in-saddlebow-incinerator-proposal-1-4213456

Published on Thursday 30 August 2012 16:15

THE Lynn incinerator project is set to go to a full public inquiry after ministers decided to call-in the scheme, it has emerged this afternoon.

News of the decision emerged within the last hour, as tomorrow’s edition of the Lynn News went to press, and has been hailed by residents and politicians in West Norfolk who have fought against the scheme, with the support of thousands of people who have voiced their opposition to the government.

Leading campaigner Mike Knights said: “I am absolutely delighted at this news. It means it’s going to be the first time that this planning application will be heard by an independent, decision-making body.”

As previously reported, members of Norfolk County Council’s planning committee voted to grant permission for the plant at their meeting in June, subject to the scheme not being called-in by ministers.

A holding directive was issued by communities’ secretary Eric Pickles on the eve of that meeting to prevent final permission from being granted until the government gave ultimate approval. The plant has already received an environmental permit to operate, but needs planning consent.

But it is understood that the issue will now be referred to an inquiry led by a planning inspectorbecause of the regional and national implications of the development.

It is also believed that around 6,000 letters were sent to the Department for Communities and Local Government by people opposed to the proposal, a record number for the department.

And North West Norfolk MP Henry Bellingham has paid tribute to the public’s contribution to the campaign.

He said: “This is really fantastic news. It’s a very important development.

“It’s the result of thousands of people who have written in and joined the campaign and I am deeply indebted to them, because without them, we wouldn’t have got this call-in.”

South West Norfolk MP Elizabeth Truss said the government had done the right thing in listening to the public.

She said she also plans to continue lobbying the Treasury to review the basis of the government’s contribution to the financing of the plant.

A multi-million pound grant towards the cost of the scheme was approved by environment secretary Caroline Spelman earlier this year.

But, following the latest ruling, there is likely to be many more months of uncertainty over whether the plant will be built at all.

Norfolk County Council say they have not received any official notification of the decision, while Cory Wheelabrator, the consortium hoping to build the plant, have not yet commented.

Further updates when available

China: trends in hazardous air pollutants from MSW incinerators

Temporal trend and spatial variation characteristics of hazardous air pollutants emission inventory from municipal solid waste incineration in China

Hezhong TIANJiajia GaoLong LuDan ZhaoKe Cheng , and Peipei Qiu

Environmental Science & Technology

Publication Date (Web): 24 Aug 2012 (Article)

DOI: 10.1021/es302343s

Abstract

A multiple-year emission inventory of hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) including particulate matters (PM), SO2, NOX, CO, HCl, As, Cd, Cr, Hg, Ni, Pb, Sb, and polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDD/Fs), discharged from municipal solid waste (MSW) incineration in China has been established for the period 2003-2010 by using best available emission factors and annual activity data. Our results show that the total emissions of NOX, SO2, CO, PM, HCl, Sb, Hg, Pb, Cr, Ni, Cd, As, and PCDD/Fs have rapidly amounted to 28471.1 metric tons (t), 12062.1 t, 6500.5 t, 4654.6 t, 3609.1 t, 69.5 t, 36.7 t, 9.4 t, 4.4 t, 2.8 t, 926.7 kg, 231.7 kg, and 23.6 g TEQ (Toxic Equivalent Quantity) by the year of 2010, respectively. The majority of HAPs emissions are concentrated in the eastern central and southeastern areas of China where most of MSW incineration plants are built and put into operation. Between 2003 and 2010, provinces always rank at the top three with largest HAPs emissions are: Zhejiang, Guangdong, and Jiangsu. To better understand the emissions of these HAPs and to adopt effective measures to prevent poisoning risks, more specific field-test data collection are necessary.

Incinerating paradise

http://www.chinadailyapac.com/article/incinerating-paradise

The waste incinerator plan for Shek Kwu Chau features a 150-meter-tall chimney beside the secluded island. The Environmental Protection Department recommended building a waste incinerator in Shek Kwu Chau to solve Hong Kong’s pressing waste problems. (Photos by Doug Meigs / China Daily)

Shek Kwu Chau is an idyllic, almost pristine island on the southern edge of Hong Kong waters. Few people actually live there, though the island provides a quiet retreat for recovering substance abusers. But the tranquility of the place is soon to disappear. The island has been chosen as the site for a new waste incinerator.

It’s 20 minutes by ferry from Cheung Chau to Shek Kwu Chau, a picturesque island in the southernmost part of Hong Kong territory. It’s off-limits to most people. Visitors need special permission from SARDA — the group that operates a big drug rehab center on the island. So, I felt privileged to have been invited to the island now swept up in a battle over government plans to build a giant waste incinerator.

Most of those on the ferry are staff and recovering addicts.

Among our fellow passengers is longtime Cheung Chau resident Martin Williams, He’s an avid naturalist, writer and an opponent of the incinerator. He wears a field scientist getup, floppy safari hat and hiking sandals.

Williams had visited Shek Kwu Chau a few times before, tagging along with US biologist James Lazell, who had discovered two snakes known to exist only on the island — Hollinrake’s Racer and a subspecies of Jade Vine Snake.

“The island has some unique wildlife. Lots of things: bugs, snakes, lizards, sea eagle nests, and the big one is the finless porpoise, which uses Shek Kwu Chau for breeding,” he says.

Upon arriving at the island, Williams steps onto the pier and immediately admires the clarity of the water— “much better than Cheung Chau,” he says, pointing at small schools of corral fish.

The island’s superintendent, Patrick Wu, is waiting. He offers a hearty greeting at the pier. He is a retired corrections officer, dressed in casual business attire-short-sleeved shirt and khakis.

Shek Kwu Chau is laden with intriguing relics of the past.

At the end of the pier we pass through a giant Chinese city gate, past a mural depicting a scene of Qing Dynasty officials dumping opium, and then a menagerie filled with peacocks. Buildings fashioned with Neoclassical and Baroque facades give way to pagodas and shrines. There is a Roman bath, a Taoist temple, a Buddhist temple and a Christian Church. There are white statues of martial artists striking kung fu poses, standing in contrast to emotive female and male nudes reminiscent of Renaissance masters.

The air here is notably fresh.

Tourists would love the place, if it weren’t restricted.

Only family members of recovering addicts, and a few locals from Cheung Chau who visit the graves of ancestors buried here, make occasional trips on the twice-daily ferry.

The island is part of Hong Kong’s largest drug rehab facility, managed by the government-funded Society for the Aid and Rehabilitation of Drug Users (SARDA).

The superintendent ushers us into his white SUV with the license plate “SKC 1”. He cruises the narrow road meandering up and around Shek Kwu Chau’s dual peaks.

More than 10 buildings appear scattered throughout the thick trees and overgrowth. A total population of nearly 250 lives on the island — that’s 50 staff and 200 rehab clients.

Compared to the island’s residents, we are all overdressed, in the sweltering heat. Most of the rehab clients are half-naked and barefoot. All are men, aged from their early-20s through middle-aged. There’s a work crew deepening the reservoir. Some are walking dogs, part of an animal therapy program. Everybody is sweating profusely.

What has drawn the scientist and superintendent together in common cause was the decision of the Town Planning Board, rezoning adjacent waters to allow construction of a massive grate incinerator. Hong Kong, hard pressed to find a solution to its massive waste problems, plans to burn 3,000 tons of waste here every day. A 150-meter-tall tower is planned to be built on an artificial island. The reclaimed land on which the tower will sit, will cover over the habitat of the finless porpoise, a species that the IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) Red List identifies as “vulnerable”.

The isolation of the island is helpful for the therapy of recovering addicts. Some may experience withdrawal pangs. They can suffer here amid the quiet and solitude, away from the distractions of the busy city.

It was the isolation of the island that drew the attention of the Environmental Protection Department (EPD), when staff began seeking a site to build a waste incinerator.

Environmentalists responded with fierce opposition to the Shek Kwu Chau plan.

While most criticism for the incinerator hinges on environmental concern. SARDA’s position is different. The organization is more worried about its clients, the recovering addicts.

“Drug abusers tend to be quite passive and don’t think very highly of their own status. If you move an incinerator there, they might feel like it’s because they’re rubbish. I’ve heard that sentiment expressed,” says May Cho, a SARDA assistant superintendent of social service, who joined China Daily on the fast ferry from Central to Cheung Chau for the connecting boat.

Today, amid legal challenges, the incinerator project has been “officially” stalled for months.

In favor of Shek Kwu Chau, an alternative site for the incinerator had been passed over — at the Tsang Tsui Ash Lagoons — a barren part of Tuen Mun, situated beside a power station, landfill and existing infrastructure. According to the EPD’s Environmental Impact Assessment, the more-expensive island reclamation option carried more ecological risks, but lower risk of damaging air quality of the neighbors.

The Legislative Council on Environmental Affairs rejected funding for the proposed Integrated Waste Management Facilities in April, and the Court of First Instance accepted an application for a Judicial Review of the EPD’s Environmental Impact Assessment in June.

While the legal battle drags on, management of Shek Kwu Chau’s rehabilitation center hangs in limbo. They await a decision of the judicial review, which will open hearings on November 14. The island’s superintendent says his organization has shared its concerns with the EPD, only to receive assurances that the incinerator technology does not pose a health hazard.

May Cho is a former social worker for SARDA. She used to commute to the island daily and fondly remembers walking past the island’s dragonflies, before she took a promotion to SARDA’s Wan Chai headquarters. Williams says a nearby incinerator would disrupt the island’s insect life, too.

Wu explains SARDA’s concerns while continuing our tour of the island: “There could be air pollution, the smell of garbage, noise pollution, and even light pollution when the plant is lit up at night.”

The EPD actually predicted the incinerator would become a tourist attraction, drawing about 300 visitors a day to the artificial island. Wu bristles at the prospects, “That’s the last thing I want.” After all, the island is restricted.

Incinerator construction is estimated at five years. Once it goes into operation, the disruption of the island’s peaceful serenity would be even greater.

“The noise would be terrible,” says Wu. “Even the motor of a small boat passing nearby is very clear. Who knows how noisy five years of construction will be. They say, ‘Oh, it’s all right, (the construction crews) won’t do it at night time.’ So they will only do it in the daytime? Well, most our clients sleep during the daytime when they are undergoing detoxification, then they suffer insomnia and walk around at night.”

Wu says SARDA communicated its concerns to the EPD, and the department went ahead with obtaining rezoning permission anyway.

SARDA began operating in Hong Kong in 1961. It opened the Shek Kwu Chau facility in 1963. It has three additional rehab centers around Hong Kong.

Before SARDA began managing the island, Wu said it was like the uninhabited “backyard” of Cheung Chau. It also contains the grave of a British captain’s wife who died at sea in 1845.

Wu gives credit to JB Hollinrake (a superintendent from 1972-1990) for defining the peculiar flavor of the architecture, which appears a surreal hodgepodge of classic Western and Chinese influences.

The late Princess Diana of Wales even visited Shek Kwu Chau twice while in Hong Kong. Wu says he believes the princess’ parents had some relation to Hollinrake’s family. A free standing archway, with plaques and photos on either side, commemorates her visit near the sculpture garden.

Wu laments that no drug rehab facilities are comparable to Shek Kwu Chau in Hong Kong or abroad. He once visited Bath in England just to see their ancient Roman baths. “I think ours are more spectacular,” he says with a big grin. He knows the island’s kitsch is only part of Shek Kwu Chau’s irreplaceable formula for success.

“You are a free man on the island,” he beams. “Unlike other rehab facilities — where the client will be locked up in a building, here, you can walk along the trail, or go to other houses to visit. This is a community, and it would be very difficult to find a replacement.”

We continue driving and stop at the buildings nearest to where the incinerator island would appear.

Laundry is hung up outside a small white-washed dormitory building. A herd of goats is rummaging for scraps. Some of the men come outside to say hello.

Samuel, a 35-year-old from Mei Foo, says he has four months left on the island. “It’s not good to destroy the environment here. It’s hard to find air as fresh as this.”

Williams points at some small boats and construction workers. “That drilling platform is doing a seabed exploration ready for the incinerator island.” The ocean opens before us. The Soko Islands appear small on the horizon.

The EPD proposed a 300-acre marine reserve across the waters to mitigate the loss of porpoise habitat. He wonders if the artificial island construction and subsequent waste-laden barge traffic would have already ruined the area for the marine mammals.

Wu is interested in conserving the local natural environment, but his professional obligation is ensuring the center maintains its ability to rehabilitate drug addicts.

SARDA has served as custodian of Shek Kwu Chau for half a century. He says they don’t have any plans to abandon their work on the island now.

He drives us down the mountain and we board a ferry headed back to Cheung Chau. The boat departs, and after a moment, the remote island has shrunk back onto the horizon, off-limits once again

Invitation- International Conference on Solid Waste 2013: Innovation in Technology and Management (Hong Kong Baptist University)

From: ARCPE-ICSW [mailto:icswhk@hkbu.edu.hk]
Sent: 21 August, 2012 15:51
To: arcpe – icsw
Subject: Invitation- International Conference on Solid Waste 2013: Innovation in Technology and Management (Hong Kong Baptist University)

Invitation for ICSWHK 2013

Dear Sir/Madam,

Further to the great success of the first International Conference on Solid Waste 2011, we are glad to inform you that Sino Forest Applied Research Centre for Pearl River Delta Environment, Hong Kong Baptist University is going to organize the second conference, “ International Conference on Solid Waste 2013: Innovation in Technology and Management” which will be held on5-8 May 2013 in Hong Kong. The International Conference aims to bring together various stakeholders from academia, industry, government and non-government organizations worldwideto deliberate on issues pertaining to solid waste management. It will comprise seminars, poster presentation, workshop and field trip. You are cordially invited to join us!

Call for Abstract

You are invited to submit abstracts for oral and poster presentation, the deadline for submission is 30 November, 2012.

We will offer two awards for outstanding presenters:

1. International Young Waste Researcher Award

2. Best Poster Award

Financial Aid

Partial and Full Financial Aid in the form of registration and accommodation reimbursement will be available for selected participants, who are going to submit an abstract by 30 November, 2012 and register for the conference . Priority will be given to those who are going to present a paper, attend the conference, coming from developing countries and/or having a student status.

Interested parties can apply through the Conference Secretariat: (icswhk@hkbu.edu.hkarcpe@hkbu.edu.hk) .

Journal publication

All accepted abstracts and papers will be published in conference proceedings. Selected papers from the conference will be considered for publication in a special issue of SCI-listed journals. ( Last year we published the selected papers in a special issue of “Bioresource Technology” and “Environmental Technology”.)

Please kindly visit our Conference website at http://arcpe.hkbu.edu.hk/conf2013 for more details. You may also wish to check out more details of our last conference athttp://arcpe.hkbu.edu.hk/conf2011 .

The conference brochure is also herewith attached for your kind perusal. Please contact our Conference Secretariat if you need more information.

You are welcome to distribute this invitation notice to relevant faculty members/post doctoral students/colleagues or any interested parties for participation.

We are looking forward to seeing you in our Conference!

P.S. Please accept our apologies if there is any case of double-mailing of this email.

Yours faithfully,

Conference Secretariat

ICSWHK2013

Sino-Forest Applied Research Centre for Pearl River Delta Environment (ARCPE)

Hong Kong Baptist University

Tel: (852) 3411 2537

Fax: (852) 3411 2095

Website: http://arcpe.hkbu.edu.hk/conf2013

Email: (icswhk@hkbu.edu.hk,arcpe@hkbu.edu.hk).

Download PDF : ICSWHK_HKBU_leaflet

Green group picks up recycling at your door

SCMP

Of course, this should be legally mandatory for all households and businesses to recycle, then we don’t need the landfills or daft incinerator ………………….. wake up please, ENB

Green group picks up recycling at your door
For a low monthly fee, non-profit venture will come to your home once a week for collection
John Carney
SCMP Aug 19, 2012

An innovative, non-profit-making recycling programme hopes to transform the way waste is recycled in the city, while also helping the disadvantaged.

HK Recycles’ plan is simple and straightforward. You sign up for their service online, they provide you with hard, non-woven bags for your recyclables, then once a week they come and collect it from you. And recycling collectors will be hired almost exclusively from the city’s marginalised groups. Initially collections will be every Friday, but as the project expands more collection days will be added. The first collections will be on August 31.

The project has started operations in Causeway Bay, Admiralty, Happy Valley and Kennedy Town, with about 50 households already signed up. There is a small cost involved. Customers pay HK$100 for the first month, then HK$80 per month after that. Credit cards can be used.

The company only employs five people at the moment, but founder Brian Mak has big ambitions.

“By the end of next year, we hope to have 1,000 customers. We’re going to recycle more than 300-400 pounds [136-181kg] in our first month alone,” he said. “With 1,000 people signed up, our goal is to have recycled 1 million pounds by the end of next year. We only expect to break even financially, but that’s not why we’re doing it.”

Their good intentions don’t stop here. Currently the organisation is working out employment agreements with two main groups: Harmony House, a charity that helps battered women and victims of domestic abuse, and cleaning women in a local cleaning collective. Many women in both groups are single mothers with a history of physical abuse.

Mak explained HK Recycles was first and foremost a social enterprise, and aside from being environmentally focused, it aimed to contribute to the community by creating employment opportunities for those who needed them most. He hoped to employ about 30-50 people from marginalisedbackgrounds.

“By providing employment for people who would otherwise not be employable and paying above-market wages, our hope is to equip and empower these people,” he said. “To help them overcome tough personal conditions and give them the confidence and resources needed to flourish in Hong Kong.”

HK Recycles also intends to donate a percentage of the revenue it makes from recyclables to charities and community groups in the region.

For details visit http://http://www.hkrecycles.com or e-mail contact@hkrecycles.com

john.carney@scmp.com