Clear The Air News Blog Rotating Header Image

Incineration – Solid Waste Disposal

Incinerators double childhood cancer | Greenpeace UK

http://www.greenpeace.org.uk/toxics/incinerators-double-childhood-cancer
Incinerators double childhood cancer
no incineration

Between 1974 and 1987, twice as many children who lived within 5km of
incinerators in the UK died from cancer, compared to those who lived
further away, according to new research published in the International
Journal of Epidemiology.(1)

The study comes on top of others which have found significant increases
in cancers, of both adults and children, around incinerators(2) (3).
However, because incinerators are often sited in industrial or deprived
areas, scientists have been unable to say for sure that it is the toxins
from burning mixed waste that are causing these extra cancers. Other
industrial pollution or lifestyle factors, such as a poor diet, could be
to blame, they say.

But the latest study found that there was no increase in cancer around
“non-combustion” sites such as football grounds and biscuit makers. This
appears to rule out social factors such as diet. Cancers around hospital
incinerators were at similar levels to those around municipal waste
incinerators, indicating that incineration could be the common cause.
This led the author of the report, Professor George Knox of Birmingham
University, to conclude that while nearby sources of industrial
pollution might also contribute, the incinerators were “probably
carcinogenic”.

The study was based on detailed examination of childhood deaths from
cancer around 72 municipal and 307 hospital waste incinerators. Most of
the incinerators studied have now been closed and those that remain are
subject to tighter controls. However, even the most modern incinerators
emit substances known to cause cancer as well as heavy metals and
ultra-fine dust particles which can have a range of other health
effects. Despite this the Government continues to insist on building new
incinerators.

(1) International Journal of Epidemiology, 2000; 29:391-397 (2) Elliot
P, Shaddick G, Kleinschmidt I et al Cancer incidence near municipal
solid waste incinerators in Great Britain, British Journal of Cancer
1996; 73:702-10 (3) Elliot p, Eaton N, Shaddick G, Carter R, Cancer
incidence near municipal solid waste incinerators in Great Britain. Part
2:histopathological and case-note review of primary liver cancer cases,
British Journal of Cancer 2000, 82(5), 1103-1106

State of Knowledge of the Impacts of Waste Incinerators on Human Health

Download PDF : Incinerationandhealth

CTA Letter to Legco

Download PDF : CTAlettLegcoFinancePanelPubWork

Enhanced Landfill Mining / sell our household and food waste instead of burying it

Legco

Dear Finance Panel on Public Works Subcommittee members

This reverse landfill mining could happen NOW on all our landfills and they CAN be reverse-mined using plasma gasification

Meanwhile we can SELL our daily MSW to Europe as a commodity rather than burying it since they have massive overcapacity there and need to import waste as a commodity to generate power and heat rather than using oil.

See the story at :

http://www.waste-management-world.com/articles/2011/05/plasma-power-goes-large-at-landfill-mining-project.html

Kind regards,

James Middleton

Chairman

www.cleartheair.org.hk

Download PDF : FILE_88d8faee-d7e5-4f4a-88c7-e3fa4af1c12d(1)

Final treatment of MSW and C&I waste in Germany and neighbouring countries. How to cope with emerging over- capacities?

Download PDF : Berthoud(1)

Wales mulls biowaste landfill, incineration ban

Wales mulls biowaste landfill, incineration ban http://www.endseurope.com/32222/wales-mulls-biowaste-landfill-incineration-ban?referrer=news

Wales may ban sending food and garden waste to landfill and for incineration, after a food waste collection service was rolled out to 90% of households.

The success of the food waste collection service has eliminated odour and vermin problems. This means the Welsh government will be able to cut the frequency of residual household waste collections to just once a month in the near future, an official said at a conference last week.

The government will publish a white paper on its plans in the autumn, he added.

The European Commission is considering a ban on sending compostable waste to landfill as part of a wide-ranging review of EU waste law now underway. A ban on landfilling waste that has not been pre-treated to eliminate methane emissions was also mooted in a recently launched EU consultation.

Sweden implemented a ban on sending organic waste to landfill in 2005. The measure has been a “major catalyst” for the diversion of municipal solid waste from landfill, according to the European Environment Agency.

Germany plans to have nationwide collection of biodegradable waste in place by 2015, which will enable diversion of almost all organic waste to composting or anaerobic digestion, a spokeswoman for the European Compost Network said. Across the EU, only 29% of biowaste is collected separately, she added.

Wales will invest around €60m in anaerobic digestion facilities to treat the 150,000 tonnes of food waste the country produces annually, the official said. The facilities will generate 60 megawatts of renewable energy. A new 11,000t plant will open later this year, with a second 22,500t plant to begin operation next spring.

In neighbouring England, central government is spending almost €300m on a controversial scheme to help cash-strapped local authorities to continue to provide weekly residual waste collections. Central government says the measure is necessary from a public health perspective.

But some local authorities are using the money to trial food-waste composting services as an alternative.

Follow Up:

Welsh government waste and recycling http://wales.gov.uk/topics/environmentcountryside/epq/waste_recycling/?lang=en

Comparative Assessment of Particulate Air Pollution Exposure from Municipal Solid Waste Incinerator Emissions

Download (PDF, 5.5MB)

Villagers ready to fight incinerator

If it cost $630 a tonne to handle ship and dump MSW 13 years ago what does it cost now ?

We could sell or give it to Europe including the shipping cost, for far less. They can send their own ships.

Europe currently has 7 milion tonnes incineration capacity and only 1.5 million tonnes of MSW feedstocks.

South China Morning Post

Published on South China Morning Post (http://www.scmp.com)

Home > Villagers ready to fight incinerator



Villagers ready to fight incinerator

Sunday, 20 February, 2000, 12:00am

Jennifer Ehrlich

TUEN MUN has emerged as the most probable site for two waste incinerators the Government plans to build to burn rubbish that will soon overflow Hong Kong’s landfills.
Green groups and the nearby villagers in Lung Kwu Tan are preparing for a fight over the $10 billion project.

Scientists are still arguing whether burning waste pollutes the air. The decision to incinerate Hong Kong’s rubbish comes at a time when the Government has also vowed to improve air quality.
The two 150-megawatt incinerators will burn 6,000 tonnes of rubbish a day and convert the heat into electricity. The incinerators are the second stage of the Government’s long-term plan to stop digging landfills.

Green groups and people who live close to the earmarked site said incinerators emitted harmful dioxins and mercury.
‘Whatever comes out of the incinerators will pollute our air, our water and the food that we eat,’ said Clement Lam, a local Greenpeace campaigner.

‘There is no safe level of dioxin.’ Hong Kong is a target of Greenpeace’s international campaign to fight incinerators. Mr Lam said the Government was choosing a hasty and dangerous option to deal with waste. But Kim Salkeld, Deputy Secretary of the Food and Environment Bureau, said: ‘That’s complete and utter rubbish. Ten years of work has gone into the incinerator project and it is only one component of a range of waste-reduction efforts.’ The Government has completed the first part of the plan – to phase out old polluting incinerators and promote domestic recycling.


But green groups say waste-burning incinerators should be a part of the past.
‘We have closed down incinerators in the past, but that does not mean we will be building the same kind as before,’ said Conrad Lam, principal environmental protection officer at the Environmental Protection Department.

When Hong Kong set up its landfills in the 1980s, planners expected they would last half a century. But waste disposed of in Hong Kong’s three landfills has risen from 12,500 tonnes a day in 1989 to 18,000 tonnes a day last year. The amount of domestic waste has nearly doubled from 5,000 tonnes a day in 1984 to 9,300.

Mr Lam said the other three sites at Junk Bay, Lamma Island and Ha Pak Nai were still being considered, but during the environmental impact study, problems emerged with each of these locations.

The incinerators must be in areas where the wind will blow ash away from Hong Kong, and in places that are near to power plants, so that energy generated by the incinerators can be used for electricity.

Junk Bay and Lamma Island have large populations and wind complications. In Ha Pak Nai, the nearby villages with 400-year-old archeological ruins and wetlands would make it more expensive and complicated to locate the plant there, Mr Lam said.

But the possibility of building the incinerator at an entirely new location had not yet been ruled out, Mr Lam said.

The studies have been under way since 1997. Mr Lam said the incinerator project would not move forward until the environmental assessment was completed for Ha Pak Nai.

The Government estimates it costs $630 a tonne to handle, ship and dump Hong Kong’s rubbish – nearly $6 million a day. The new incinerators will cost an additional $260 million a year to operate.

Topics:

Environment

Environment

Man Made Disaster

Incinerators



Source URL (retrieved on Jun 8th 2013, 10:38am): http://www.scmp.com/article/308628/villagers-ready-fight-incinerator

cid:image001.png@01CE6433.A18C28B0Tit Cham Chau

http://globalvoicesonline.org/2008/09/15/hong-kong-save-the-ha-pak-nai-wetland/ 2008

According to a mainstream media report( quoted from inmediahk.net), a major developer in Hong Kong is planning to develop one of the most beautiful piece of wetland called Ha Pak Nai (下白泥)in Yuen Long. The plan is to build 122 country houses, 56 village style hotels, a golf court around the 5 million square meters wetland and a tiny insect museum, which means the whole wetland area will be privatized in term of spatial arrangement. People’s blog urges people to submit form against the town planning application. The deadline is Sept 26. The blogger also posts a map showing the details of the development plan.

lib.hku.hk/hkspc/Geotech/GeotechnicalReports.xls

GE/97/14

Laboratory Testing

N. T.

Soils & Materials Engineering Co., Ltd.

Feature No. CE 97/96 F.S. of Waste-to-Energy Incineration Facilities Land Site Investigation of Ha Pak Nai

GE/97/15

Ground Investigation

N. T. West

Enpack (Hong Kong) Ltd.

Agreement No. CE 97/96 Feasibility Study for Waste-to-Energy Incineration Facilities S.I. Requirements for Ha Pak Nai Site

GE/97/18

Laboratory Testing

Marine

MateriaLab Ltd.

Agreement No. CE 97/96 F.S. for Waste-to-Energy Incineration Facilities Marine S.I. at Tuen Mun (Black Point)

GE/97/18

Laboratory Testing

Marine

MateriaLab Ltd.

Agreement No. CE 97/96 F.S. for Waste-to-Energy Incineration Facilities Marine S.I. at Lamma Island Site

GE/97/18

Laboratory Testing

Marine

MateriaLab Ltd.

Agreement No. CE 97/96 F.S. for Waste-to-Energy Incineration Facilities Tit Cham Chau

GE/99/11

Laboratory Testing

N. T.

Soils & Materials Engineering Co., Ltd.

Agreement CE 68/2000 Feasibility Study for Animal Carcass Treatment Facilities S.I. – Review Phases & Design of G.I. Groundwater Sampling

GE/99/11

Laboratory Testing

N. T.

Soils & Materials Engineering Co., Ltd.

Agreement No. CE 45/99 Extension of Existing Landfills and Identification of Potential New Waste Disposal Sites

GE/2003/18

Geophysical Surveys

EGS (Asia) Ltd.

Agreement No. CE37/2002 (EP) Environmental Review of Urban Landfills and Tseung Kwan O Landfills – Feasibility Study Additional Works – Trial Geophysical Survey of Waste Boundary (Western Boundary of Ma Yau Tong West Landfill)

GE/2005/47

Chemical and Biological Testing of Sediment

Lam Laboratories Ltd.

Contract No.: CV/2004/13 Temporary Construction Waste Sorting Facilities at Tseung Kwan O Area 137 and Tuen Mun Area 38. Chemical Testing of Sediment.

GCC will now look at incinerator alternatives after it agrees to back planning refusal

http://www.stroudnewsandjournal.co.uk/news/10427738.print/

site_logo

GCC will now look at incinerator alternatives after it agrees to back planning refusal

12:00pm Saturday 18th May 2013

By Chris Warne

GLOUCESTERSHIRE County Council will defend the decision of its planning committee to refuse permission for the £500 million Javelin Park incinerator project near Haresfield.

The authority’s planning committee unanimously opposed the controversial application in March and at a meeting at Shire Hall on Wednesday (May, 15) it was agreed that a cross-party working group should be established immediately to consider alternatives.

GCC’s Conservative administration signed a 25-year contract with Urbaser Balfour Beatty for the plant back in September and the company could still appeal the planning committee’s refusal.

But anti-incineration campaigners from GlosVAIN welcomed GCC’s commitment to support its planning committee in the event of an appeal as a ‘huge step forward’.

Campaigners did express disappointment, however, that the motion tabled by former Lib Dem leader Jeremy Hilton (Kingsholm and Wotton) was watered down.

The original wording of Cllr Hilton’s motion had said: “This council recognises that the waste incinerator project no longer has the support of this council following the outcome of the county council elections.”

And it added: “Mechanical Biological Treatment may be a suitable technology as an alternative to burning household waste.”

Labour leader Lesley Williams (Stonehouse) subsequently proposed an amended motion, omitting the reference to MBT and the outcome of the elections, which Conservative leader Mark Hawthorne (Quedgeley) said his party was prepared to back.

The revised motion, which was passed unanimously, called on the authority’s chief executive to “seek robust support to defend the unanimous planning committee decision in any appeal process that may take place in the future.”

It also said: “This Council should immediately establish a ‘Plan B’ cross-party working group to consider alternatives to the current proposals for a waste incinerator at Javelin Park.”

Sue Oppenheimer, chairman of GlosVAIN, said: “We are very pleased that there was enormous support to look again at options for waste and we hope that GCC will also approach UBB to assess whether they are prepared to look at other options which we understand the contract allows them to do.”

Speaking after the meeting Green Party Cllr Sarah Lunnon (Stroud Central) praised the new minority Conservative administration for seeking ‘to find a solution based on consensus rather than strong-arm tactics’.

Back

© Copyright 2001-2013 Newsquest Media Group

http://www.stroudnewsandjournal.co.uk

/

Panel EA visit to Korea – some glaring information omissions

Legco

Panel on Environmental Affairs

Dear Hon Members,

I refer to the briefing papers / fact sheets provided by the Administration for your recent visit to Korea.

Please find at attachment herewith highly relevant information which the Administration conveniently omitted from their briefing papers.

Kind regards,

James Middleton

Chairman

www.cleartheair.org.hk

We all breathe the same air don’t pollute it further

Panel on Environmental Affairs
Duty visit from 1 to 5 April 2013

The Legislative Council Panel on Environmental Affairs conducted a 5-day overseas duty visit to Seoul, Republic of Korea, from 1 to 5 April 2013. The purpose of the visit was for Members to study the experience of the Republic of Korea in various aspects of waste management, including waste reduction, waste recycling and treatment infrastructure.

The delegation was led by Hon Cyd HO Sau-lan, Chairman of the Panel on Environmental Affairs, and comprises 16 other members: Hon Christopher CHUNG Shu-kun (Deputy Chairman of the Panel on Environmental Affairs), Hon Vincent FANG Kang, Hon CHAN Hak-kan, Hon CHAN Kin-por, Hon Claudia MO, Hon Gary FAN Kwok-wai, Hon Charles Peter MOK, Hon KWOK Wai-keung, Dr Hon Helena WONG Pik-wan, Dr Hon Elizabeth QUAT and Hon Tony TSE Wai-chuen (Panel members), as well as Hon Emily LAU Wai-hing, Hon Tommy CHEUNG Yu-yan, Hon Frederick FUNG Kin-kee, Hon Paul TSE Wai-chun and Hon WONG Yuk-man (non-Panel Members).

http://www.legco.gov.hk/general/english/sec/duty_v/yr12-16/ea20130401.htm

Information Papers

Power-point presentation materials on the exhibition on the “Panel on Environmental Affairs’ Overseas Duty Visit to the Republic of Korea” prepared by the Legislative Council Secretariat

Download PDF :

Koreawaste

Incineratorhealthmatters

impact waste management singapore