Download PDF : beginners_guide_to_incinerator_emissions
Uncategorized
Human waste project trumps the Bill Gates competition | Energy Live News
Sustainable Human Intestinal Technology program (SHIT) wins funding.
Researchers are seeking donor and sampler volunteers.
Sampler volunteers would preferably be regular Newcastle Brown Ale drinkers.
http://www.energylivenews.com/2012/03/19/human-waste-project-trumps-the-bill-gates-competition/
Sustainable Energy
Human waste project trumps the Bill Gates competition
Posted on 19 March 2012 by Tom Gibson
A team of researchers from British Universities has been granted funding from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to develop a prototype system for recovering drinkable water and harvesting hydrogen energy from human faecal waste.
The team of researchers from Imperial College London, the University of Manchester and Durham University beat more than 2,000 other proposals. They believe the technology could provide a cheap device for people in the developing world to generate clean water and energy from waste and a sustainable source of hydrogen energy that could be used to power homes in developed countries.
Bacteria in the device helps extract energy and clean water from human faecal waste. During the first stage of the project the team hope to develop a stand-alone sanitation device which could make it easier and cheaper for people in developing countries to adopt the technology where large sewage networks may not exist.
Martyn McLachlan, a research fellow from Imperial College said: “In the future we may see homes in the UK generating their own clean water, energy and fertilizer simply by doing what comes naturally to us all once or twice day. More important are the implications for developing countries, where the provision of clean drinking water is essential for supporting life and self-generated energy could be used to support economic growth.”
The researchers plan to have a prototype ready to demonstrate by 2013.
Wen: next HK chief will have ‘majority’ support
Clear the Air says:
We just had a jet-set joyriding Chief Executive who is departing in 2012 (possibly sooner than he expects), leaving us with filthy air, the highest office and highest residential rents in the world and even richer tycoons then when he took up office.
Clear the Air has a simple message to the people of Hong Kong- since you cannot choose your own Chief Executive till 2017 then vote with your feet and your wallets and boycott the services offered by
the tycoons who look after their own interests and not those of the Hong Kong people.
Wen: next HK chief will have ‘majority’ support |
|||||||||
Premier insists Hongkongers will be behind whoever the Election Committee endorses in March 25 poll |
|||||||||
| Colleen Lee Mar 15, 2012 South China Morning Post |
|
||||||||
Premier Wen Jiabao yesterday assured Hongkongers that the March 25 chief executive election will produce a leader who enjoys the support of the “vast majority” of the city.
Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office director Wang Guangya said last July that the city’s next leader, who will take over from Donald Tsang Yam-kuen in July, will require a “rather high degree of acceptance” by the public. “I believe that as long as the principles of openness, justice and fairness are observed and the relevant legal procedures are complied with, the Hong Kong people will elect a chief executive who enjoys the support of the vast majority of the people in Hong Kong,” Wen said. Despite the city’s per capita GDP reaching a record high of US$34,200 last year, Wen added, Hong Kong still faced challenges in view of economic uncertainty and a widening income gap. “Hong Kong now faces both difficulties and opportunities,” he said. “The financial crisis in the world and the European debt crisis have exerted an adverse impact on Hong Kong and pressure is still there. “Hong Kong is under the dual pressures of slowing economic growth and inflation. Under such circumstances, Hong Kong must continue to work hard to develop the economy, improve people’s lives, advance democracy and maintain social harmony.” Wen also cited a saying, attributed to late paramount leader Deng Xiaoping , that “there should be confidence that the Hong Kong people can run Hong Kong well”. Critics were divided over whether Wen’s comments indicated Beijing’s preferred candidate, with the political pundit James Sung Lap-kung saying they had covered only matters of principle and were impartial. “His stress on openness, justice and fairness implies that he doesn’t want to see smear campaigns,” Sung said, adding that he believed the social and economic issues touched on were the areas that Beijing wanted the next leader to address. Commentator Allen Lee Peng-fei said he believed Wen’s mention of a leader backed by “the vast majority” suggested Beijing preferred Leung, who has been leading in opinion polls by 20 or more percentage points for several weeks. His view was echoed by Leung’s supporters, including Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference delegate Lew Mon-hung. Political scientist Ivan Choy Chi-keung said Wen’s remarks suggested the chances of a failed election were diminishing. “He seems to stress that the problem [of recent scandals] can be solved as long as the election is held according to procedures and in a fair and just manner,” Choy said. Local NPC deputy Maria Tam Wai-chu said she believed Wen’s remarks were objective and had no implications for either candidate. In a statement, Tang said he agreed with Wen that the city would elect a leader backed by the vast majority and expressed confidence in his abilities to handle the challenges spelled out by Wen. Leung made no comment. Pan-democratic candidate Albert Ho Chun-yan, who has no chance of winning, said a widely supported chief executive could be elected only if there was universal suffrage. |
|||||||||
| Zeman gives Tang full backing in race for top job | |||||||||
| Amy Nip and Tanna Chong Mar 14, 2012 |
|
||||||||
| Entrepreneur Allan Zeman, who earlier hinted he would only vote for chief executive candidate Henry Tang Ying-yen if he improved his popularity in opinion polls, has backtracked to give Tang his full support. The chairman of Ocean Park and Lan Kwai Fong Holdings previously stated that he would only vote for the former chief secretary if he closed the gap on rival Leung Chun-ying to 20 percentage points.
Now he is refusing to specify a threshold, saying public opinion has changed and it looks good for Tang. Zeman, a long-time Tang supporter, will vote for him in the March 25 election after recent events. |
|||||||||
Tang’s wife comes under scrutiny over basement
SCMP
| Joyce Ng Feb 18, 2012 |
|
||||||
|
The Buildings Department has launched an investigation into chief executive hopeful Henry Tang Ying-yen’s wife and others over an illegal “underground palace” at her house in Kowloon Tong. The investigation may lead to criminal chages, but it is uncertain whether Tang, who co-owned the house at 7 York Road with his wife Lisa Kuo Yu-chin until 2010, is involved in the probe. The department said last night that it had started an investigation in response to media reports that suggested the 2,250 square foot basement at the house existed before an occupation permit was issued in 2007. Tang said the basement was built after the permit was issued, essentially dismissing reports he had concealed the basement project from inspectors. All relevant parties – including the architect, structural engineers, contractors and Kuo – had been invited to provide information for the investigation, the department said. Any unapproved building work could “constitute an offence” under the Buildings Ordinance, it said. It would also be an offence if someone “knowingly misrepresents” a fact in any plan or certificate submitted to the department, it added. In parallel with the investigation, the department has sent a letter giving Kuo seven days to submit a work schedule for demolishing the basement. The announcement came a day after the Tangs admitted they knew the basement was illegal. Kuo claimed all responsibility for the project, saying her husband knew few details. Eric Cheung Tat-ming, a law professor from the University of Hong Kong, said police should help in the investigation, since buildings officers had limited powers to look for witnesses and written records. Cheung said that judging from the couple’s admission on Thursday, “there are reasonable grounds for suspicion that somebody has committed a criminal offence”. Under part 1AA of section 40 of the Buildings Ordinance, the department could prosecute “any person who knowingly contravenes” the requirement to obtain approval for beginning construction work. Offenders face a fine of up to HK$400,000 and two years in prison. If work on the basement began before 2007, he said, there would be grounds to believe the couple and their architects had conspired to defraud the department, which said it was unaware of any underground work at the time. The police said they would monitor the developments closely, but “it was not convenient for police to intervene”, while the Buildings Department was following up on the matter. |
|||||||
Clear the Air says
Download PDF : Clear the Air says (1)
Clear the Air says:
Well, we had Lexusgate, now it’s Basementgate. The common denominator being Principal HK Government officials, supposedly of the highest integrity, were apparently caught cheating and hence unfit to hold such, or future public positions.
We wonder how the York Road premises owners managed to avoid paying the additional land premium for the luxury basement (2400 x 5000 = HK$12 million+ ?) and whether they notified the Rating and Valuation department of the additional basement area or just kept paying the old rates?
The house was built with deep piles so the intention to expand the basement seems apparent to the man in the street.
Who signed the cheque for the basement design, which architect designed it in the full knowledge it was an illegal structure and who signed their cheque, who signed the cheque for the contractors to build it and the furniture and fittings?
Tang is an acknowledged wine buff and the newspaper allegations are that there is a wine cellar and wine tasting room among other structures there. We presume that these substantial sums used to buy the houses were duly recorded with the Inland Revenue Department ?
Tang’s reply to date is disingenuous and lacks full disclosure – and he wants to be the Chief Executive? It appears he has dug his dungeon or his political grave.
Is it any wonder that in Hong Kong the Government and its principal officials deem themselves above the Law which applies to the plebs and not to them? This is why in Hong Kong, NGO’s must seek to embarrass Government into environmental policy action or changes since they are non-negotiable, or we must sue them by Judicial Review. There is no middle ground.
The health of the public suffers in the meantime as a result of their blinkered arrogant apathy.
Storeroom or basement palace? |
|||||||
Tang admits illegal work done on house he owned with his wife, but says he’s not sure he saw floor plan showing lavish 2,400 sq ft underground complex |
|||||||
| SCMP Staff Reporters Feb 16, 2012 |
|
||||||
| Henry Tang Ying-yen, whose campaign for chief executive is embroiled in a furore over illegal structures at his Kowloon Tong properties, last night said he was not sure if he had even seen the floor plan for what is being dubbed his “underground palace”.
Tang’s answers at a press conference yesterday appeared to be evasive – a political ally called them “hardly convincing” – and some of his backers were reconsidering their support for him. One election committee member – a Tang supporter in the business sector who was considering withdrawing his backing last night – confirmed the existence of the underground compound and said reports that it contained a wine cellar and a Japanese bath were true. However, Tang said: “I have no impression that I have seen the floor plan before. [The basement] is now mainly used for storage.” He said work on illegal structures at 7 York Road, now owned solely by his wife (Tang owns the house next door), began after the house was completed and issued with an occupation permit in 2007. Tang admitted on Monday that they had undertaken excavation work in the car park and said the underground space was used to store groceries. The disclosures are having an impact on Tang’s ambition to take the top post in the city. The Liberal Party, of which Tang was once a member, said it was reconsidering its support for his candidacy. It called on him to explain the matter fully. Party chairwoman Miriam Lau Kin-yee said last night: “If nothing had happened, chances are high that we will vote for Tang. But given what has happened, we will have a review of [our support], after taking into account his explanation. His explanation so far seems hardly convincing.” She urged him to open up his property to the media for inspection. “Our concern now is the extent of the illegal structures and what he will do to remedy it,” she said. Another supporter on the committee, Thomas Woo Chu, vowed to rethink his backing despite having already handed in his nomination. “We are so-called friends as both of us have the heart to serve Hong Kong,” said Woo, who led a 17-member team that won all the seats in the catering subsector in the Election Committee poll in December. “We need to observe him further. Nomination and support in the vote are two separate matters.” Lau and Woo spoke hours after a Chinese-language tabloid, Sharp Daily, published a floor plan that, it claimed, showed the illegal basement had a total floor size of 2,400 sq ft – larger than the 2,217 sq ft footprint of the house itself. The plan, said to have been drawn up in 2003, shows a 430 sq ft wine cellar, wine-tasting room, home theatre, Japanese bath, gym, changing room, toilet and storeroom. The newspaper said Tang’s wife, Lisa Kuo Yu-chin, was responsible for overseeing the construction work. Tang said the house had taken about 10 years to build, and relatives had helped him oversee the construction. He called the description of the basement facilities inaccurate. The Buildings Department said last night that it would be inspecting Tang and Kuo’s properties today. It said its officers inspected 7 York Road on January 24, 2007, and found no unauthorised structures. It issued an occupation permit nine days later. Tang has said he and his wife once shared ownership of the 7 York Road house, but it is now solely owned by his wife through a private company. His election rival, pan-democrat Albert Ho Chun-yan, said Tang had lost all credibility. He also urged him to open the house to the media. “It is a lot more than a storeroom – it is a palace indeed,” he said. But legislator Jeffrey Lam Kin-fung, another Tang supporter, said the row was no more serious than the one about Leung Chun-ying’s alleged conflict of interest in an architectural design contest. “Leung’s involves public interest, while Tang’s is only a personal one,” he said. |
|||||||
| Tang responds to publication of floor plan | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SCMP Danny Mok 9:00pm, Feb 15, 2012 |
Top of Form
Bottom of Form Top of Form Bottom of Form |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A local newspaper on Wednesday published a floor plan of what it said was a 2,400 square foot illegal basement in a property in Kowloon Tong owned by Henry Tang Ying-yen and his wife. The chief executive contender has been dogged all week by a controversy dealing with an illegal underground structure on his property. The site in question is at 7 York Road in Kowloon Tong next to 5A York Road where the Tang family lives. The floor plan published in the late edition of Sharp Daily is said to show a floor area larger than that of the house and include a store room, wine cellar, a wine tasting room, theatre, gym and Japanese bath. The source of the floor plan was not disclosed in the report, Tang had earlier said the block was just a storage area for miscellaneous items. On Wednesday evening in response to the publication of the floor plan, Tang reiterated that the underground structure was a storage area and said that he had no recollection of ever seeing this floor plan. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Although Henry Tang Ying-yen has taken the flak for illegal structures at a Kowloon Tong property, his wife is accountable under the law. The Buildings Department says in a mandatory removal order or prosecution for such breaches, it is the property owner listed in the land registry who will be held responsible. On Monday, Tang admitted a storage area had been built under the swimming pool at 7 York Road. Illegal additions, including a car park canopy, had also been made at another Tang property at 5A. “Upon … confirming the illegal structures, we will issue notices to the concerned owner listed in the land registry,” a department spokeswoman said. According to the land registry, Tang’s wife, Lisa Kuo Yu-chin, owns 7 York Road via On-Power, a company registered in the British Virgin Islands. Past declarations of interest show Tang transferred his shareholding in the company to Kuo around 2010, making her sole owner of the house. Tang owns 5A via another firm, Bluehouse Investments. If Kuo fails to fix the breaches, she faces a maximum fine of HK$200,000 and one year in jail. However, Kuo, who was in the spotlight last year after Tang admitted having an affair, is not likely to face charges other than illegal building works. Greg Wong Chak-yan, former vice-chairman of the Town Planning Board, said media concerns about a possible violation of the town planning ordinance or the land lease for excessive floor space generated from the illegal works did not seem valid. Wong said the property’s outline zoning plan for maximum floor space could not be enforced because the property existed before the plan was enacted, while the old land lease, dating to 1930, did not specify how much floor space was allowed. “There remains only one law capable [of] holding the property owner responsible. That’s through enforcement on unauthorised building works under the Buildings Ordinance,” he said. Legislator Cyd Ho Sau-lan said the Buildings Department should not let Kuo walk away after fixing the building irregularities. “Given the seriousness of the illegal works, a direct prosecution should be seriously considered,” she said. HOME DRAMA May 2002 On-Power Limited – a company registered in the British Virgin Islands with Henry Tang and his wife Lisa Kuo listed as directors – buys 7 York Road, Kowloon Tong. Nov 2002 Henry Ho Chung-yi, architect for Tang, submits building plan for redevelopment. 2006/2007 Redevelopment completed and occupation permit issued by Buildings Department. June 2010 Tang transfers stake in On-Power to his wife, making her sole owner of the company, land lot and house. May 2011 Chief Executive Donald Tsang Yam-kuen asks senior officials to check properties for illegal structures. May to end 2011 Tang says he hired consultant to inspect No 5A and 7 York Road for unapproved work. But he was not required to report back to Tsang. October 2011 Ming Pao files questions to Tang about illegal structures; Tang denies existence of wine cellar in No 5A. February 13, 2012 Tang admits illegal structures in his properties, saying basement garage was extended to store groceries. February 14 Buildings officers try in vain to enter properties for inspection.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tang admits having illegal structures |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chief executive candidate denies cover-up in row over two properties in upmarket Kowloon Tong |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cheung Chi-fai, Peter So and Tanna Chong SCMP Feb 14, 2012 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Chief executive candidate Henry Tang Ying-yen says he will remove illegal structures from two properties owned by members of his family in upmarket Kowloon Tong, amid claims the issue has raised questions about his integrity. Tang denied there was a cover-up involving the illegal structures linked to his home, and blamed any confusion on a “misunderstanding” in handling media inquiries on the matter in October. Admitting they were illegal structures, Tang pledged to take responsibility for having them removed. They include an excavated area on an unoccupied property adjoining his home, a construction which one newspaper said was a wine cellar. Tang said they also included a canopy covering a car park at his home at 5A York Road that was allegedly left by the previous owner more than a decade ago and a skylight window on the roof of No 7, an adjoining property that is unoccupied at the moment. Tang confirmed that his family owned both properties. Tang gave no deadline for having the structures removed. “As a man, one needs to have shoulders and as a public officer, one needs to have backbone,” Tang said at a briefing yesterday morning. Last night Tang apologised during a radio broadcast and in a statement for causing public concern after the Chinese-language newspaper Ming Pao reported that a wine cellar was allegedly being built at 7 York Road. Tang denied that the excavated area at the site, which was connected to the base of a swimming pool, was used as a wine cellar, as reported by Ming Pao. Despite his denial, a lawmaker whose party is backing a rival candidate in the race for the city’s next chief executive, called on Tang to come clean on the issue. “There is clearly a question of integrity. It indicates Tang, who was then chief secretary for administration [until resigning late last year to contest the race to be the next chief executive], might have wanted to lie to his bosses and public,” said Lee Wing-tat, a member of the Democratic Party, which is backing the candidacy of Albert Ho Chun-yan. Ming Pao quoted contractors who once worked inside 7 York Road as saying the wine cellar was secretly built with a hidden entrance somewhere in the house. A plan of the property kept by the Buildings Department since 2002 does not show a structure under the house. A spokesman for the department said they would arrange a site inspection as soon as possible. Asked by the newspaper last October if such a structure existed, Tang denied it. That denial, Tang said yesterday, was based on a misunderstanding. “The misunderstanding arose from a question asked. The two properties belong to my family and I was using only No 5. The question asked was whether there was a wine cellar at No 5,” he said, adding that there was no wine cellar at his home. The latest revelation comes just days after Tang’s arch rival, Leung Chun-ying, was embroiled in a controversy relating to his alleged conflict of interest as an adjudicator over a tender for the West Kowloon arts hub project. Leung said last night he believed Tang would handle the matter well. Last May, Chief Executive Donald Tsang Yam-kuen asked his senior officials to check whether their properties contained any illegal structures after a string of public figures and officials were named as contravening building regulations. Yesterday’s exposure raised questions in the media about whether Tsang knew about the illegal work at Tang’s home. A spokesman for the Chief Executive’s Office said Tsang had asked senior officials only to inspect their properties and had not asked them to report back to him on the results. The two properties are registered under overseas-based companies based in the British Virgin Islands. Bluehouse Investments bought No 5A for HK$46.5 million in 1996 and On-Power bought No 7 for HK$36 million in 2002. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It is worth noting that someone provided information to the press regarding CY Leung’s company involvement with a tenderer for the West Kowloon project ten years ago – Henry Tang used to be the Chairman of the West Kowloon project. Both Tang and CY Leung were members of Exco but nothing was raised about this matter until recently. We wonder who was the source of the attempted muck throwing ?
Is this the first time Tang’s integrity was questioned ?, well, not really ………………………………………….
Harbourfest case
Tang was involved in the Harbour Fest controversy as Chairman of the Economic Relaunch Strategy Group responsible for pushing ahead with the plan to spend $100 million to revive the economy after SARS, and said that he should be held responsible. Tang had said that although Mike Rowse, a senior civil servant, had actually signed the contract, Rowse as such was not required to be held politically responsible.[7](Wikipedia) However, during a Working Group meeting on 31 October, 2003 and during an independent inquiry in May 2004, Tang allegedly said Rowse had not acted improperly and that there had been no irregularity in the implementation of the event.[8] Tang had also said that all parties had under-estimated the complexity of the event and may have been too ambitious in organising it in such a short timespan. He later withdrew the remark: just before a government inquiry opened on November 2004, Tang requested the ERWG minutes be deleted.[8] Internal governmental disciplinary process fined Rowse for misconduct, but a High Court judge quashed the government ruling on 4 July 2008. Political commentator Frank Ching pointed to the huge credibility gap of the government. He noted that the attempt of Tang to shift political responsibility from himself, as the minister responsible, to a senior civil servant, was a travesty of justice for Rowse, and went against the Accountability System.[9] (Wikipedia)
Extra-marital affair
On 4 October 2011, in the midst of rumours about his extra-marital affair, Henry Tang issued a statement, in which he admitted that he had made a mistake in his romantic life in the past and he deeply regretted it. He specifically did not elaborate on the sex of the person he had an admitted affair with. He said that his wife had forgiven him. His wife said in the statement that there had been difficult times in their relationship and that he has faults, but that she also appreciated his strengths. She acknowledged him as her ‘best partner’.[17] National People’s Congress Standing Committee member Rita Fan said on 7 October 2011 that she didn’t know about Mr Tang’s now widely publicised infidelity when she offered her support and she refused to rule herself out of standing in the following year’s Chief Executive election, though she did not in fact stand.[18] Wikipedia
Rare Chinese white dolphin gets DNA bank
http://www.mysinchew.com/node/69034
A Chinese white dolphin or Indo-Pacific humpback dolphin, nicknamed the pink dolphin, swims in waters off the coast of Hong Kong. Photo courtesy: AFP
HONG KONG, January 14, 2012 (AFP) – A Hong Kong conservation group said Saturday it has set up a DNA bank for the rare Chinese white dolphin, also known as the pink dolphin, in a bid to save the mammals facing a sharp population decline.
There are about 2,500 Chinese white dolphins in the Pearl River Delta region, the body of water between Macau and Hong Kong, with the majority of the mammals in Chinese waters and the rest in Hong Kong.
But experts say their number has dropped significantly in the past few years due to overfishing, an increase in maritime traffic, water pollution, habitat loss and coastal development.
In a bid to save the dwindling population, the Ocean Park Conservation Foundation Hong Kong said it had joined hands with a Chinese university to set up a DNA bank, which will also spearhead a genetic research project.
“We hope to offer the scientific community a standardised genetic analysis platform to assess the sustainability of Chinese white dolphin populations,” Judy Chen, the foundation chairwoman said in a statement.
“The collected data will provide important reference to governments in the region for developing critical strategies of Chinese white dolphin conservation,” she added.
The biological samples of these dolphins will be sent to the DNA bank to investigate the environmental impacts on the mammal, the statement said.
The Chinese white dolphins, a sub-species of the Indo-Pacific humpback dolphins, are unique for their pink skin. They are listed as “near threatened” by the International Union for Conservation of Nature.
The mammal was the official mascot at the handover ceremony when the former British colony returned to Chinese rule in 1997, while dolphin watching is a favourite tourist attraction in Hong Kong.
Its population in Hong Kong has dropped from an estimated 158 in 2003 to only 75 in 2010, according to the Hong Kong Dolphin Conservation Society.
The EK Yeoh annual Oration, Hong Kong College of Community Medicine, 27 November 2011, Anthony J Hedley
Powerpoint slide show: http://sph.hku.hk/download/hkccm2011_final.pps
Speech: http://sph.hku.hk/download/hkccm2011_final.pdf
Useful links for download
Tetronics Treatment of Asbestos Containing Material
Related Product:
Related Product:
Tetronics’ Organics Datasheet.
Related Product:
Treatment of Hazardous Wastes Datasheet
Tetronics Trials Facility Datasheet
Related Products:
Abestos Containing Materials
Contaminated Land
Fly Ash & APC Residues
Medical & Clinical Waste
Organics e.g. PCBs & Dioxins
Petrochemical Wastes
Tetronics’ Spent Potliner Datasheet
Related Product:
Tetronics’ Petrochemical Datasheet
Related Product:
Tetronics’ Full Organics Datasheet
Related Product:
Tetronics’ Full WEEE Datasheet
Related Product:
Tetronics’ Full Precious Metal Recovery Datasheet
Related Products:
Catalyst Wastes
Steel Plant Wastes
Tetronics’ Full Tundish Heating Brochure
Related Product:
The British Chamber of Commerce announces the launch of the ‘Growing Together’ project in partnership with HSBC
Letting Hong Kong’s Children Learn about Green Issues
The British Chamber of Commerce’s Environment Committee is pleased to announce the launch of the ‘Growing Together’ project in partnership with HSBC. 20 schools (10 international and 10 local schools) have been selected to take part in this one‐year pilot programme, during which students will work with Microgardens and Bokashi composting systems to foster their awareness of environmental and sustainability issues……….
Download PDF : Growing Together ENG Press Release -FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 27 October 2011