Clear The Air News Blog Rotating Header Image

August 15th, 2013:

Public consultation on waste charge necessary

Thursday, 15 August, 2013, 12:00am

CommentLetters

Philip Bowring says it is “nonsense” to consult the public on waste charging (“Land policy on shaky ground [1]“, August 11).

He sees consulting the public as either a lack of confidence on the part of government or lack of an effective plan to sell waste charging to the public and legislators.

Let me set this straight. The last administration consulted the public in early 2012 on whether the principle of waste charging was acceptable to the public.

Over 60 per cent of respondents accepted waste charging as a concept.

This administration has already announced that it is our policy to charge for municipal solid waste and our aim is to start charging by 2016, as we will need to pass legislation before we can impose a charge.

We have to work out the details of how to put together a waste charging scheme that works for Hong Kong, where 80 per cent of the people live in high-rise buildings.

We also plan to charge commercial and industrial companies for their municipal solid waste.

The Council for Sustainable Development will launch the public consultation process very soon based on how charging could be designed for Hong Kong.

It is critical for successful implementation to have public acceptance of a territory-wide charging scheme.

This is why we need to consult before finalising the scheme, after which we can draft the necessary legislation and put it to the legislature.

Legislators will also benefit from the result of the consultation as to how the public sees waste charging.

We have studied the various types of charging schemes overseas. What is clear is success comes from getting the details right, sustaining public communication so people understand how it works (many questions will arise along the way), and pitching the charge at a level that can garner the widest support.

If Bowring were responsible for implementing a waste-charging scheme, I suspect he would not say it is “nonsense” to consult on the details of the scheme.

Christine Loh, undersecretary for the environment



Links:
[1] http://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/article/1295818/troubled-leung-governments-land-policy-shaky-ground

New York City landfill lawsuit settled more than two decades later

Waste & Recycling News

New York City landfill lawsuit settled more than two decades later

By Jim Johnson

Thursday, August 15, 2013

New York City has agreed to pay $12 million to settle a 22-year-old lawsuit involving children who contracted cancer while living near the closed Pelham Bay landfill in the Bronx, according to local news reports.
The money will go to 12 families that had children develop leukemia, including three children who died.
The solid waste landfill closed in 1979, but not before more than a million gallons of toxic waste was illegally dumped their over the years, The New York Times reported.
Families of the sick children sued the city, alleging New York failed to stop the illegal dumping. City administrations, for years, fought the lawsuit while acknowledging the landfill’s problems. Settlement of the case came as a trial was scheduled to start next month, the newspaper said.

Link: http://www.wasterecyclingnews.com/article/20130815/NEWS01/130819972?template=printarticle

Copyright © 1995-2013 Crain Communications Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Statement