These are the Chinese newspapers reported the JR case. The first and the fifth article (The Sun and Oriental Daily) belong to the same group mentioned Tsang’s likely collusion with the developers in the first and the last paragraph.
郭更質疑指，曾蔭權原本計劃在離任後到深圳福田居住，而另一選址屯門曾咀剛好鄰近福田，在曾咀興建焚化爐，可能影響到曾蔭權的「新
居」和福田發展商的利益，當局選址上可能涉及利益輸送。
Kwok suspected that Tsang’s original retirement plan was to live in Futian, and the other site is coincidentally located in Tsang Tsui near Futian. If the incinerator were to be built in TT, this might affect Tsang’s new home and the interest of the developers. The EPD might have colluded with the developers.
郭續指，當局考慮在屯門曾咀或石鼓洲興建垃圾焚化爐時，聲稱焚化爐不會造成污染，結果以會加劇污染為理由否
決在曾咀興建，與先前的說法自相矛盾。
Kwok continued to point out that when the EPD was making decision between SKC and TT, they claimed that the incinerator would not cause pollution. However, their reason for rejecting TT was that it would further pollute TT. This contradicted their original claim.
成報 – 20120304 – 唐梁何環保論壇首過招 跨區整治有共識 建焚化爐分歧大
文匯 – 20120304 – 長洲坊會主席入稟 反環署建焚化爐
新報 – 20120304 – 石鼓洲填海建垃圾焚化爐 老翁恐污染入稟阻興建
明報 – 20120304 – 倡建焚化爐 台下報噓聲 論壇首同台 唐得分遠遜梁何
明報 – 20120304 – 石鼓洲建焚化爐長洲居民提覆核