Clear The Air News Blog Rotating Header Image

September 12th, 2011:

Reply from EPD

Dear Mr Furner,

Thanks for your enquiries about PM2.5 measurement on 28 August.

PM2.5 is a major part of PM10, accounting for 60% to 70% of the total mass concentration of the latter measured in Hong Kong.  The measurement of PM10 can therefore effectively reflect the levels of PM2.5.  As the sources of PM2.5 are also common to PM10, e.g., power plants, vehicles, industrial sources, etc., the government’s efforts to reduce PM10 concentrations can effectively reduce PM2.5 levels.

To understand the nature and characteristics of the PM2.5 in HK and their correlation with PM10, we have been conducting different projects including speciation studies (analysis of the chemical composition of PM2.5) and continuous measurement at 5 sites in HK.  From time to time, the PM2.5 data from these projects are provided to and used by public members including academics and media for studies and reporting, and are included in different publications and reports.  Here are a few of them :

To enhance our monitoring of PM2.5, we are working to extend the PM2.5 continuous measurement to all stations in Hong Kong with a view to making it a regularly monitored and reported pollutant.  We are now taking steps to install and test PM2.5 samplers in all monitoring stations.  The test runs of the samplers in the network are expected to be completed by end of this year.

From our previous studies and research findings from our local academics, a very significant proportion of particulates including PM10 and PM2.5 measured in Hong Kong are contributed by regional sources.  According to a study by the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology in 2005, the contribution of particulates from regions outside Hong Kong (including Pearl River Delta Region and regions outside PRD) could be some 60% on an annual basis and even higher at 70% during winter.  To alleviate the particulates problem, we have been working with Guangdong Provincial Government on a regional air quality management plan to reduce emissions in the PRD region and making substantial efforts to reduce local emissions of these particulates, in particular those from two major sources, namely power plants and motor vehicles.  Measures implemented in the past years include:

  • Power sector – banning new coal-fired generation units since 1997, imposing stringent emission caps on power plants since 2005, requiring power plants to increase the use of natural gas for electricity generation, requiring retrofitting of advanced air pollution control equipment to existing coal-fired generation units,
  • Motor vehicles – requiring the use of cleaner motor vehicle fuels such as LPG and the virtually sulphur-free Euro V diesel and petrol, mandating the retrofit of particulate reduction devices in pre-Euro diesel vehicles, subsidizing the replacement of old commercial diesel vehicles and providing tax incentives for environment-friendly vehicles.  Franchised bus companies have also retrofitted their Euro II and III buses with diesel particulate filters, which could reduce their particulates emissions by over 80%.

The above efforts have borne fruits.  Between 2005 and 2010, the annual PM2.5 concentrations in Hong Kong reduced by 26%.  The results of our speciation studies show that, between 2001 and 2009, the levels of elemental and organic carbon compounds (which are major constituents of PM2.5 coming from motor vehicles) at the roadside have reduced by more than 50%.  This clearly reflects that our control measures implemented in the past decade have very effectively reduced the PM2.5 emissions from our local vehicle fleet.

Despite the above improvements, the Government is endeavouring to introduce more new measures for improving the air quality including cutting of particulate emissions, such as requiring the power companies to maximize the use of the existing natural gas-fired generation units, thereby increasing the share of natural gas in local electricity generation to about 50%; and to prioritize the use of those coal-fired generation units equipped or retrofitted with advanced air pollution control equipment, so as to further tighten the already very stringent emission caps by about 30 to 50% from 2015; introducing relevant regulations to promote energy efficiency for electrical appliances and buildings; proposing emission standards for non-road mobile sources; implementing a host of new measures to reduce emissions from the transport sector, such as a ban on idling vehicles with running engines, a subsidy to encourage early replacement of Euro 2 diesel commercial vehicles with new ones, a trial of retrofitting franchised buses with “Selective Catalytic Reduction” devices to reduce emissions and the Government to fund the retrofit if the trial is proved to be successful; designating pilot Low Emission Zones at busy corridors in Causeway Bay, Central and Mong Kok and setting up a Pilot Green Transport Fund to encourage introducing innovative transport technology, etc.

Best regards,
C. F. Chow, (Mr.)

Senior Environmental Protection Officer, Acting
Environmental Protection Department

The Mortality Effects of Long-Term Exposure to Particulate Air Pollution in the United Kingdom

Executive Summary
1 This report deals with answering what, at first glance, appear to be relatively simple
questions regarding the effects of particulate air pollution on mortality in the UK. We
have tried to explain not only the approaches we have used to answer the questions,
but also the limitations of the interpretations that can be put on the results. We
anticipate that it will be useful to policy makers and elected representatives, and hope
also that it will make a helpful contribution to public awareness and understanding of
the health effects of air pollution. In summary:
a Airborne particles comprise an anthropogenic component and a natural
component.
b There is an interest in the effects of air pollution on mortality in terms of the
impact that policies for reduction would have, or the current burden in terms
of public health.
c These effects can be expressed at the population level in terms of life
expectancy, and on loss or gain in life years. The burden can also be expressed
in terms of deaths occurring in a specified year across the population.
d As everyone dies eventually no lives are ever saved by reducing environmental
exposures – deaths are delayed resulting in increased life expectancy.
e These measures are averages or aggregates across the population; it is not
known how the effects are distributed among individuals.
2 We conclude that:
a Removing all anthropogenic (‘human-made’) particulate matter air pollution
(measured as PM2.5 1) could save the UK population approximately 36.5 million
life years over the next 100 years and would be associated with an increase in
UK life expectancy from birth, i.e. on average across new births, of six months.
This shows the public health importance of taking measures to reduce
air pollution.
b A policy which aimed to reduce the annual average concentration of PM2.5 by
1 μg/m3 would result in a saving of approximately 4 million life years or an
increase in life expectancy of 20 days in people born in 2008.
c The current (2008) burden of anthropogenic particulate matter air pollution is,
with some simplifying assumptions, an effect on mortality in 2008 equivalent

Executive Summary1 This report deals with answering what, at first glance, appear to be relatively simplequestions regarding the effects of particulate air pollution on mortality in the UK. Wehave tried to explain not only the approaches we have used to answer the questions,but also the limitations of the interpretations that can be put on the results. Weanticipate that it will be useful to policy makers and elected representatives, and hopealso that it will make a helpful contribution to public awareness and understanding ofthe health effects of air pollution. In summary:a Airborne particles comprise an anthropogenic component and a naturalcomponent.b There is an interest in the effects of air pollution on mortality in terms of theimpact that policies for reduction would have, or the current burden in termsof public health.c These effects can be expressed at the population level in terms of lifeexpectancy, and on loss or gain in life years. The burden can also be expressedin terms of deaths occurring in a specified year across the population.d As everyone dies eventually no lives are ever saved by reducing environmentalexposures – deaths are delayed resulting in increased life expectancy.e These measures are averages or aggregates across the population; it is notknown how the effects are distributed among individuals.2 We conclude that:a Removing all anthropogenic (‘human-made’) particulate matter air pollution(measured as PM2.5 1) could save the UK population approximately 36.5 millionlife years over the next 100 years and would be associated with an increase inUK life expectancy from birth, i.e. on average across new births, of six months.This shows the public health importance of taking measures to reduceair pollution.b A policy which aimed to reduce the annual average concentration of PM2.5 by1 μg/m3 would result in a saving of approximately 4 million life years or anincrease in life expectancy of 20 days in people born in 2008.c The current (2008) burden of anthropogenic particulate matter air pollution is,with some simplifying assumptions, an effect on mortality in 2008 equivalent …………………..

Download PDF : comeap the mortality effects of long-term exposure to particulate air pollution in the uk 2010

Review of the UK Air Quality Index

Executive Summary
The Committee on the Medical Effects of Air Pollutants (COMEAP) Standards Advisory
Subgroup was asked by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) to
review the UK air quality index (AQI) to ensure that it is fit for purpose. The current UK air
quality index has now been in operation essentially unchanged for a period of around 12 years.
Therefore, it is timely to review the index to determine its suitability, given the developments in
the field of air quality.
The air quality index is used to communicate information about real-time and forecast levels of
outdoor air pollution in the short term. Forecasted air quality information is reported in terms
of the air quality index and provides advanced warning of potentially health-damaging air
pollution events. With advanced warning of poor air quality, individuals who are sensitive to
the effects of air pollution can have the opportunity to modify their behaviour to reduce the
severity of their symptoms. The air quality index does not provide guidance on the effects of
long-term exposure to air pollution.
The pollutants included in the current index are particulate matter (PM10), ozone (O3), sulphur
dioxide (SO2), carbon monoxide (CO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2). The index has four bands
indicating ‘Low’, ‘Moderate’, ‘High’ and ‘Very High’ levels of air pollution. These bands are
further divided into a ten-point scale to provide greater gradation of air pollution levels.
The current air quality index was developed by COMEAP and is based on health evidence. The
‘Low’ bands indicate air pollution levels where it is unlikely that anyone will suffer any adverse
effects of short-term exposure, including people with lung or heart conditions who may be more
susceptible to the effects of air pollution. The ‘Moderate’ band represents levels of air pollutants
at which there are likely to be small effects for susceptible people only. Values for the ‘High’
bands are associated with significant effects in susceptible people. At ‘Very High’ levels of air
pollution even healthy individuals may experience adverse effects of short-term exposure.

Executive SummaryThe Committee on the Medical Effects of Air Pollutants (COMEAP) Standards AdvisorySubgroup was asked by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) toreview the UK air quality index (AQI) to ensure that it is fit for purpose. The current UK airquality index has now been in operation essentially unchanged for a period of around 12 years.Therefore, it is timely to review the index to determine its suitability, given the developments inthe field of air quality.The air quality index is used to communicate information about real-time and forecast levels ofoutdoor air pollution in the short term. Forecasted air quality information is reported in termsof the air quality index and provides advanced warning of potentially health-damaging airpollution events. With advanced warning of poor air quality, individuals who are sensitive tothe effects of air pollution can have the opportunity to modify their behaviour to reduce theseverity of their symptoms. The air quality index does not provide guidance on the effects oflong-term exposure to air pollution.The pollutants included in the current index are particulate matter (PM10), ozone (O3), sulphurdioxide (SO2), carbon monoxide (CO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2). The index has four bandsindicating ‘Low’, ‘Moderate’, ‘High’ and ‘Very High’ levels of air pollution. These bands arefurther divided into a ten-point scale to provide greater gradation of air pollution levels.The current air quality index was developed by COMEAP and is based on health evidence. The‘Low’ bands indicate air pollution levels where it is unlikely that anyone will suffer any adverseeffects of short-term exposure, including people with lung or heart conditions who may be moresusceptible to the effects of air pollution. The ‘Moderate’ band represents levels of air pollutantsat which there are likely to be small effects for susceptible people only. Values for the ‘High’bands are associated with significant effects in susceptible people. At ‘Very High’ levels of airpollution even healthy individuals may experience adverse effects of short-term exposure.

Download PDF : comeap review of the uk air quality index